• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左主干冠状动脉经皮介入治疗与依维莫司洗脱支架在女性与男性中的有效性比较。

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Percutaneous Intervention of the Left-Main Coronary Artery With Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Women -Vs- Men.

机构信息

Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2019 Nov 1;124(9):1357-1362. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.060. Epub 2019 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.060
PMID:31493828
Abstract

Everolimus-eluting stents are largely used for left main (LM) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Long-term follow-up of patients who underwent LM PCI in a real world clinical setting, in particular women, have been scarcely reported. Consecutive patients who underwent unprotected LM PCI with EES at a single Institution from December 2006 to April 2016 were included. Main outcome assessed was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as a composite of death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization at follow-up. Overall, 589 patients (20.8% women) were included in the present analysis. Women were older, had lower body mass index and more frequently hypertensive compared with men. Main clinical presentation was stable coronary artery disease (CAD); unstable angina was more frequently observed in women compared with men, whereas ST-elevation myocardial infarction was less frequent. After 69.7 ± 28.3 months of follow-up, 47 patients overall experienced MACE (1.43 per 100patients/year). MACE rate was higher in women compared with male patients, with a rate of 2.49 and 1.17 per 100patients/year, respectively (p = 0.015). The difference was driven mainly by higher mortality in women (0.89 vs 0.15 per 100*patients/years, p = 0.002). At multivariable Cox regression, female gender was independently associated with an increased risk of MACE at follow-up (hazard ratio 2.21, 95% confidence interval 1.20 to 4.08, p = 0.011). In conclusion, EES can be safely and effectively adopted for LM PCI.

摘要

依维莫司洗脱支架在左主干(LM)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中得到广泛应用。在真实临床环境中,对接受 LM PCI 的患者,特别是女性患者进行长期随访的报道很少。本研究连续纳入 2006 年 12 月至 2016 年 4 月在单一机构接受无保护 LM PCI 并使用 EES 的患者。主要终点是随访时主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生,MACE 定义为死亡、心肌梗死或靶病变血运重建的复合终点。本研究共纳入 589 例患者(20.8%为女性)。女性患者年龄较大,体重指数较低,且高血压的发生率高于男性。主要临床表现为稳定型冠心病(CAD);与男性相比,女性更常发生不稳定型心绞痛,而 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的发生率较低。随访 69.7±28.3 个月后,共有 47 例患者发生 MACE(1.43/100 例患者/年)。女性患者的 MACE 发生率高于男性患者,分别为 2.49/100 例患者/年和 1.17/100 例患者/年(p=0.015)。这种差异主要是由于女性患者的死亡率较高(0.89/100 例患者/年比 0.15/100 例患者/年,p=0.002)。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,女性是随访时发生 MACE 的独立危险因素(风险比 2.21,95%置信区间 1.20 至 4.08,p=0.011)。总之,EES 可安全有效地用于 LM PCI。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Percutaneous Intervention of the Left-Main Coronary Artery With Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Women -Vs- Men.左主干冠状动脉经皮介入治疗与依维莫司洗脱支架在女性与男性中的有效性比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Nov 1;124(9):1357-1362. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.060. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
2
Two-year clinical outcomes of the NOBORI biolimus-eluting stents versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stents in small vessel disease.NOBORI生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与XIENCE/PROMUS依维莫司洗脱支架治疗小血管疾病的两年临床疗效
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov;88(5):E132-E138. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26360. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
3
Intravascular Ultrasound Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Implantation of Everolimus-eluting Stents for Long Coronary Lesions.依维莫司洗脱支架植入治疗长冠状动脉病变后主要不良心血管事件的血管内超声预测因素
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017 Feb;70(2):88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
4
Dedicated bifurcation stents or regular drug eluting stents in distal left main stenosis: A retrospective study.专用分叉支架或普通药物洗脱支架治疗左主干远端狭窄:一项回顾性研究。
Cardiol J. 2018;25(2):188-195. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0084. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
5
Long-term results of the randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (RACES-MI trial).依维莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的随机对照长期结果(RACES-MI试验)
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 1;202:177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.08.123. Epub 2015 Aug 16.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus- Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: 5-Year Results From SORT OUT IV.依维莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架的安全性和疗效:SORT OUT IV 研究 5 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 23;67(7):751-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.051.
7
Five-Year Outcome After Implantation of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Randomized Trial Participants and Nonenrolled Eligible Patients: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.随机试验参与者和符合条件但未入组患者中依维莫司和佐他莫司洗脱支架植入 5 年后的结果:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;2(3):268-276. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5190.
8
Comparison of Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架植入术的疗效比较
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;120(3):380-386. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.038. Epub 2017 May 10.
9
Comparison of 2-year outcomes between zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting new-generation cobalt-chromium alloy stents in real-world diabetic patients.在真实世界的糖尿病患者中,佐他莫司洗脱与依维莫司洗脱新一代钴铬合金支架的两年结局比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;86(1):E11-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25797. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
10
Impact of gender on clinical outcomes after mTOR-inhibitor drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with first manifestation of ischaemic heart disease.性别对首次表现为缺血性心脏病的患者接受 mTOR 抑制剂药物洗脱支架植入后的临床结局的影响。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Oct;19(5):914-26. doi: 10.1177/1741826711420001. Epub 2011 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex Differences in Procedural Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Bifurcation PCI.分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的手术特征和临床结局的性别差异
Korean Circ J. 2025 Jan;55(1):5-16. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0172. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
Sex Differences in Patients Undergoing Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Angina: Data From a National Registry.稳定型心绞痛患者行左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的性别差异:来自全国注册登记研究的数据。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 19;13(22):e036569. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036569. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
Gender-Associated Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Third-Generation, Ultrathin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stent: A Real-World, Single-Center Experience.
使用第三代超薄支架药物洗脱支架进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的性别相关结果:一项真实世界的单中心经验。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 11;8:796604. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.796604. eCollection 2021.
4
A Personalized Approach to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the Left Main Coronary Artery-Is the Female Gender Associated with Worse Outcomes?左主干冠状动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的个性化方法——女性性别是否与更差的预后相关?
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 20;11(6):581. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060581.
5
Diversity is richness: why data reporting according to sex, age, and ethnicity matters.多样性即丰富性:为何按性别、年龄和种族进行数据报告至关重要。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Sep 1;41(33):3117-3121. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa277.