• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别对首次表现为缺血性心脏病的患者接受 mTOR 抑制剂药物洗脱支架植入后的临床结局的影响。

Impact of gender on clinical outcomes after mTOR-inhibitor drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with first manifestation of ischaemic heart disease.

机构信息

Istituto di Cardiologia, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Oct;19(5):914-26. doi: 10.1177/1741826711420001. Epub 2011 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1177/1741826711420001
PMID:21840968
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women have a worse outcome than men after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era, limited data are available about the impact of gender-related differences on clinical outcome. Furthermore, many series have also included patients previously treated by coronary-artery bypass grafts or PCI, which may bias the evaluation of DES-related clinical events at follow up. We aimed to assess the impact of gender on clinical outcomes in a consecutive series of patients at first manifestation of coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing PCI with mTOR-inhibitor DES.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 138 consecutive patients (age 64 ± 13 years, female gender 29%) undergoing successful mTOR-inhibitor DES implantation [sirolimus-eluting stent (SES); zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES); and everolimus-eluting stent (EES)] for the treatment of stable chronic angina or an acute coronary syndrome, as their first clinical manifestation of CAD, were prospectively enrolled between February 2008 and May 2009. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a combination of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TVR) at 12-month follow up, constituted the endpoint of the study. Fifty-one (37%) patients received SES; 46 (33%) patients received ZES; and 41 (30%) patients received EES. At follow up, 21 (15%) patients experienced a MACE. Three (2%) patients had cardiac death, five (4%) had MI, while 13 (9%) patients underwent clinically driven TVR. MACE occurred more frequently in females than males [10 (25%) vs. 11 (11%), p = 0.05]. At Cox regression analysis, the only independent predictors of MACE were female gender and implantation of more than one stent [hazard ratio (HR) 3.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-9.36, p = 0.006; HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.99-2.74, p = 0.01, respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our finding suggests that women may have a worse outcome as compared with men after mTOR-inhibitor DES implantation.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,女性的预后较男性差。然而,在药物洗脱支架(DES)时代,关于性别差异对临床结局影响的资料有限。此外,许多研究还包括先前接受过冠状动脉旁路移植术或 PCI 的患者,这可能会影响对 DES 相关临床事件的随访评估。我们旨在评估在首次出现冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的连续患者系列中,性别对接受 mTOR 抑制剂 DES 治疗的 PCI 患者临床结局的影响。

方法和结果

总共纳入 138 例连续患者(年龄 64±13 岁,女性占 29%),因稳定型慢性心绞痛或急性冠状动脉综合征而首次出现 CAD,于 2008 年 2 月至 2009 年 5 月期间接受成功的 mTOR 抑制剂 DES 植入术(西罗莫司洗脱支架[SES];佐他莫司洗脱支架[ZES];依维莫司洗脱支架[EES])治疗。主要不良心脏事件(MACE)定义为 12 个月随访时的心脏死亡、心肌梗死(MI)和临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(TVR)的组合,为该研究的终点。51 例(37%)患者接受 SES;46 例(33%)患者接受 ZES;41 例(30%)患者接受 EES。随访时,21 例(15%)患者发生 MACE。3 例(2%)患者发生心脏死亡,5 例(4%)患者发生 MI,13 例(9%)患者接受了临床驱动的 TVR。女性的 MACE 发生率高于男性[10(25%)vs. 11(11%),p=0.05]。在 Cox 回归分析中,MACE 的唯一独立预测因子为女性性别和植入超过一个支架[风险比(HR)3.70,95%置信区间(CI)1.46-9.36,p=0.006;HR 1.26,95% CI 0.99-2.74,p=0.01]。

结论

总之,我们的研究结果表明,与男性相比,女性在接受 mTOR 抑制剂 DES 植入术后的预后可能更差。

相似文献

1
Impact of gender on clinical outcomes after mTOR-inhibitor drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with first manifestation of ischaemic heart disease.性别对首次表现为缺血性心脏病的患者接受 mTOR 抑制剂药物洗脱支架植入后的临床结局的影响。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Oct;19(5):914-26. doi: 10.1177/1741826711420001. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
2
Comparison of twelve-month outcomes after percutanous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting versus zotarolimus-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents from the PROENCY (PROmus ENdeavor CYpher) registry.来自PROENCY(普罗米修斯依维莫司洗脱支架与佐他莫司洗脱支架或西罗莫司洗脱支架对比研究)注册研究的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后使用依维莫司洗脱支架与佐他莫司洗脱支架或西罗莫司洗脱支架的12个月结果比较。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Oct;24(10):495-502.
3
Everolimus-eluting stents versus sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year results from the Guthrie Health Off-Label Stent (GHOST) registry.依维莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司或紫杉醇洗脱支架的比较:Guthrie 卫生保健非适应证支架(GHOST)注册研究的 2 年结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Apr;26(2):153-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2013.12016.x. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
4
Four-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents compared to bare-metal stents for the percutaneous treatment of stable coronary artery disease.比较西罗莫司和紫杉醇洗脱支架与裸金属支架经皮治疗稳定型冠状动脉疾病的 4 年临床结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jul 1;76(1):41-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22533.
5
4-year clinical outcomes and predictors of repeat revascularization in patients treated with new-generation drug-eluting stents: a report from the RESOLUTE All-Comers trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).新型药物洗脱支架治疗患者的 4 年临床结果和再次血运重建的预测因素:RESOLUTE 所有患者试验的报告(一种新型佐他莫司洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的随机比较)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 29;63(16):1617-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.036. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
6
Sirolimus, Tacrolimus and Zotarolimus eluting stents to treat bifurcated lesions: a 7-month clinical outcome comparison.西罗莫司、他克莫司和佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗分叉病变:7个月临床结果比较
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008 Feb;56(1):35-42.
7
Long-term results of the randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (RACES-MI trial).依维莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的随机对照长期结果(RACES-MI试验)
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 1;202:177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.08.123. Epub 2015 Aug 16.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus- Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: 5-Year Results From SORT OUT IV.依维莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架的安全性和疗效:SORT OUT IV 研究 5 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 23;67(7):751-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.051.
9
Comparison of outcomes in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus after revascularization with everolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents (from the SORT OUT IV trial).比较依维莫司和西罗莫司洗脱支架血运重建后合并与不合并糖尿病患者的结局(来自 SORT OUT IV 试验)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Dec 1;110(11):1585-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.07.022. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
10
Long-term safety and efficacy of second-generation everolimus-eluting stents compared to other limus-eluting stents and bare metal stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome.第二代依维莫司洗脱支架与其他雷帕霉素洗脱支架及裸金属支架相比,在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的长期安全性和有效性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec 1;84(7):1053-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25469. Epub 2014 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
mTORC1 Deficiency Modifies Volume Homeostatic Responses to Dietary Sodium in a Sex-Specific Manner.mTORC1 缺乏以性别特异性方式调节膳食钠的容量稳态反应。
Endocrinology. 2020 May 1;161(5). doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqaa041.
2
Sex differences in long-term outcomes of coronary patients treated with drug-eluting stents at a tertiary medical center.在一家三级医疗中心接受药物洗脱支架治疗的冠心病患者长期预后的性别差异。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014 Sep 9;10:563-7. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S64696. eCollection 2014.
3
An activator of mTOR inhibits oxLDL-induced autophagy and apoptosis in vascular endothelial cells and restricts atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E⁻/⁻ mice.
mTOR的激活剂可抑制氧化型低密度脂蛋白诱导的血管内皮细胞自噬和凋亡,并限制载脂蛋白E基因敲除小鼠的动脉粥样硬化。
Sci Rep. 2014 Jul 1;4:5519. doi: 10.1038/srep05519.