Campbell Family Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health , Toronto , Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada.
Chronobiol Int. 2019 Nov;36(11):1581-1591. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2019.1661851. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
At the Center for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Integrated Day Treatment (IDT) program, each patient attends either a morning stream or an afternoon stream, but not both. We examined whether subjective chronotype, or the time of day an individual prefers to be most active and alert, predicted treatment outcomes differentially in depressed patients attending the morning vs. afternoon IDT streams. The Horne-Östberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) was administered before IDT treatment to 203 consecutive patients experiencing a major depressive episode. Multiple regression was used to predict change in depression and quality of life scores based on treatment stream (morning or afternoon), baseline MEQ scores and the treatment stream by MEQ interaction. The treatment stream by MEQ interaction was a highly significant predictor of both depression and quality of life change scores. Post-hoc analyses based on established MEQ categories revealed that definite evening chronotypes had significantly better responses in the morning stream than did morning chronotypes, and significantly worse responses in the afternoon stream relative to moderate evening or neutral chronotypes. There were insufficient morning chronotypes in the afternoon stream to assess clinical responses for this subgroup. In the morning stream only, there was a significant positive correlation between the change in MEQ scores after four weeks of IDT treatment (i.e. a shift to greater morningness) and the decrease in depression scores (r = .36, = .003), consistent with a therapeutic phase advance in circadian rhythms. In sum, these preliminary data suggest that definite evening chronotypes may have the greatest relative benefit from attending the morning vs. afternoon IDT stream. As patients currently select which IDT stream they will attend, future work based on randomized treatment assignment and using passive actigraphy to assess circadian phase is currently planned to extend these preliminary findings.
在成瘾与心理健康中心(CAMH)的综合日间治疗(IDT)项目中,每位患者参加上午班或下午班,但不能同时参加两个班。我们研究了个体更喜欢活跃和警觉的时间,即主观的时间类型,是否会对参加上午或下午 IDT 班的抑郁患者的治疗结果产生不同的预测。在 IDT 治疗前,使用霍恩-奥斯特伯格时间类型问卷(MEQ)对 203 名经历重度抑郁发作的连续患者进行了评估。使用多元回归根据治疗流(上午或下午)、基线 MEQ 分数以及治疗流和 MEQ 交互作用预测抑郁和生活质量评分的变化。治疗流和 MEQ 交互作用是抑郁和生活质量变化评分的高度显著预测因子。基于既定 MEQ 类别的事后分析表明,明确的夜间时间类型在上午班的反应明显好于早晨时间类型,而在下午班的反应明显差于中度夜间或中性时间类型。下午班的早晨时间类型不足,无法评估该亚组的临床反应。仅在上午班中,IDT 治疗四周后 MEQ 评分的变化(即向更大的早晨型转变)与抑郁评分的降低之间存在显著正相关(r=0.36,p=0.003),与昼夜节律的治疗性相位提前一致。总之,这些初步数据表明,明确的夜间时间类型可能从参加上午 vs. 下午 IDT 班中获得最大的相对益处。由于患者目前选择参加哪个 IDT 班,基于随机治疗分配和使用被动活动记录仪评估昼夜节律相位的未来工作目前正在计划中,以扩展这些初步发现。