Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China.
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow 215006, China.
Clin Radiol. 2019 Dec;74(12):956-961. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.07.024. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
To explore the relationship between computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA)-derived collateral status and CT perfusion (CTP)-derived tissue viability.
Patients having middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1/M2 segment and/or internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion and within 12 hours of onset were included. Collateral was graded from 0 to 3 on maximum intensity projection (MIP) images of CTA. The area with relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) <30% or time-to-maximum (Tmax) >10 or >12 or >14 seconds was defined as the infarct core, and Tmax >6 seconds as the penumbra. Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman's correlation tests were performed to assess the correlation between collateral grade and infarct size or mismatch ratio.
Eighty-three patients were enrolled and 52 of them met the inclusion criteria. Infarct size defined by rCBF <30% or Tmax >10 or >12 or >14 seconds and mismatch ratios were significantly different among the four groups. The correlation between collateral grades and infarct core using rCBF <30% (ρ=-0.814, p<0.01) was better than that defined by Tmax >10s, >12s or >14s. Mismatch ratio for the infarct core defined by rCBF <30% (ρ=0.945, p<0.01) had the best correlation with collateral grades.
Patients with good collaterals show a smaller infarct core and higher mismatch ratio. Infarct size defined by rCBF <30% and mismatch ratio defined by rCBF <30% and Tmax >6 seconds appear to be more correlated with collaterals in AIS patients.
探讨 CT 血管造影(CTA)衍生的侧支状态与 CT 灌注(CTP)衍生的组织活力之间的关系。
纳入发病 12 小时内大脑中动脉(MCA)M1/M2 段和/或颈内动脉(ICA)闭塞的患者。通过 CTA 的最大强度投影(MIP)图像对侧支进行 0 至 3 级分级。相对脑血流量(rCBF)<30%或达峰时间(Tmax)>10 或>12 或>14 秒的区域被定义为梗死核心,Tmax>6 秒为半暗带。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Spearman 相关检验评估侧支分级与梗死体积或不匹配比之间的相关性。
共纳入 83 例患者,其中 52 例符合纳入标准。rCBF<30%或 Tmax>10、>12 或>14 秒定义的梗死体积以及不匹配比在 4 组间存在显著差异。侧支分级与以 rCBF<30%定义的梗死核心之间的相关性(ρ=-0.814,p<0.01)优于 Tmax>10、>12 或>14 秒定义的相关性。rCBF<30%定义的梗死核心的不匹配比(ρ=0.945,p<0.01)与侧支分级的相关性最好。
侧支良好的患者梗死核心较小,不匹配比较高。以 rCBF<30%定义的梗死体积和以 rCBF<30%和 Tmax>6 秒定义的不匹配比与 AIS 患者的侧支似乎相关性更高。