Suppr超能文献

维持抗菌减少迟发性中心静脉导管相关血流感染的发生率:0.05%和 1%洗必泰的比较。

Maintenance antisepsis in reducing the rate of late-onset central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: A comparison of 0.05% and 1% chlorhexidine.

机构信息

Infection Control Division, South Miyagi Medical Center, Aza-Nishi 38-1, Ogawara, Shibata-gun, Miyagi 989-1253, Japan.

Infection Control Division, South Miyagi Medical Center, Aza-Nishi 38-1, Ogawara, Shibata-gun, Miyagi 989-1253, Japan; Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, South Miyagi Medical Center, Aza-Nishi 38-1, Ogawara, Shibata-gun, Miyagi 989-1253, Japan.

出版信息

J Infect Chemother. 2020 Feb;26(2):188-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bundled measures have been recommended to reduce the risk of central venous catheter (CVC)-related bloodstream infection. However, the importance of each procedure involved in CVC insertion/management for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) has not been thoroughly assessed. We aimed to analyze the effectiveness of maintenance antisepsis at the CVC insertion site in reducing the CRBSI risk through comparing the use of 0.05% chlorhexidine to 1% chlorhexidine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the South Miyagi Medical Center, Japan, 372 patients with a CVC who had undergone antisepsis maintenance using 0.05% chlorhexidine swabs 12 months prior to implementing 1% chlorhexidine swabs, and 344 patients at 12 months post-implementation of 1% chlorhexidine swabs, were followed prospectively for the development of CRBSI and signs of infection, and their data compared.

RESULTS

Post-implementation of the 1% chlorhexidine swabs, the CRBSI rate decreased from 3.64/1000 catheter-days to 1.77/1000 catheter-days. The risk of CRBSI decreased to 0.465 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.216-1.001). Furthermore, the risk of CRBSI ≥20 days after CVC insertion decreased to 0.200 (95% CI: 0.049-0.867); however, we found no difference between 0.05% and 1% chlorhexidine use within 19 days of CVC insertion. The increased number of patients with insertion site tenderness after implementing 1% chlorhexidine indicated a possible adverse effect of chlorhexidine.

CONCLUSION

Maintenance antisepsis with 1% chlorhexidine decreased the risk of developing CRBSI ≥20 days after CVC insertion, indicating the effectiveness of antisepsis with 1% chlorhexidine. Our data highlight the importance of maintenance antisepsis in reducing the rate of late-phase CRBSI.

摘要

背景

已推荐采用捆绑措施来降低中心静脉导管(CVC)相关血流感染的风险。然而,在预防导管相关性血流感染(CRBSI)方面,CVC 插入/管理过程中每个程序的重要性尚未得到彻底评估。我们旨在通过比较使用 0.05%洗必泰与 1%洗必泰来分析 CVC 插入部位维持消毒对降低 CRBSI 风险的效果。

患者和方法

在日本南宫城医疗中心,对 372 例接受 CVC 并在实施 1%洗必泰棉签 12 个月前使用 0.05%洗必泰棉签进行了维持消毒的患者和 344 例在实施 1%洗必泰棉签 12 个月后接受治疗的患者进行前瞻性研究,以了解他们是否发生了 CRBSI 和感染迹象,并对其数据进行了比较。

结果

实施 1%洗必泰棉签后,CRBSI 发生率从 3.64/1000导管日降至 1.77/1000导管日。CRBSI 的风险降低至 0.465(95%置信区间[CI]:0.216-1.001)。此外,CVC 插入后 20 天以上发生 CRBSI 的风险降低至 0.200(95%CI:0.049-0.867);但是,我们发现 CVC 插入后 19 天内使用 0.05%洗必泰和 1%洗必泰之间没有差异。实施 1%洗必泰后,更多患者出现插入部位压痛,表明洗必泰可能存在不良反应。

结论

采用 1%洗必泰进行维持消毒可降低 CVC 插入后 20 天以上发生 CRBSI 的风险,表明 1%洗必泰消毒有效。我们的数据突出了维持消毒在降低晚期 CRBSI 发生率方面的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验