Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Nov;7(6):781-788. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
Incomplete venous thrombolysis and residual nonstented iliac vein disease are known predictors of recurrent deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Controversy exists as to whether the number of thrombolysis sessions affects total stent treatment length or stent patency. The goal of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent single vs multiple catheter-directed lysis sessions with regard to stent extent and patency.
Consecutive patients who underwent thrombolysis and stenting for acute iliofemoral DVT between 2007 and 2018 were identified and divided into two groups on the basis of the number of treatments performed (one vs multiple sessions). Operative notes and venograms were reviewed to determine the number of lytic sessions performed and stent information, including size, location, total number, and length treated. End points included total stent length, 30-day and long-term patency, and post-thrombotic syndrome (Villalta score ≥5). The χ comparisons, logistic regression, and survival analysis were used to determine outcomes.
There were 79 patients who underwent lysis and stenting (6 bilateral interventions; mean age, 45.9 ± 17 years; 48 female). Ten patients (12 limbs) underwent single-stage treatment with pharmacomechanical thrombolysis, and the remaining 69 (73 limbs) had two to four operating room sessions combining pharmacomechanical and catheter-directed thrombolysis. Patients who underwent a single-stage procedure were older and more likely to have a malignant disease. These patients received less tissue plasminogen activator compared with the multiple-stage group (17.2 ± 2.2 mg vs 27.6 ± 11.6 mg; P = .008). Average stent length was 8.8 ± 5.2 cm for the single-stage group vs 9.2 ± 4.6 cm for the multiple-stage group (P = .764). Patients who underwent a single-stage procedure had no difference in average length of stay from that of patients who underwent multiple sessions (8.5 days vs 5.9 days; P = .269). The overall 30-day rethrombosis rate was 7.3%. Two-year patency was 72.2% and 74.7% for the single and multiple stages, respectively (P = .909). The major predictors for loss of primary patency were previous DVT (hazard ratio [HR], 5.99; P = .020) and incomplete lysis (HR, 5.39; P = .014) but not number of procedures (HR, 0.957; P = .966). The overall post-thrombotic syndrome rate was 28.4% at 5 years and was also not associated with the number of treatment sessions.
Single- vs multiple-stage thrombolysis for DVT is not associated with a difference in extent of stent coverage. Patency rates remain high for iliac stenting irrespective of the number of lytic sessions, provided lysis is complete and the diseased segments are appropriately stented.
不完全的静脉溶栓和未支架治疗的髂静脉疾病是深静脉血栓形成(DVT)复发的已知预测因素。溶栓治疗次数是否影响总支架治疗长度或支架通畅性存在争议。本研究的目的是评估接受单次与多次导管定向溶栓治疗的患者在支架范围和通畅性方面的结局。
连续纳入 2007 年至 2018 年接受急性髂股 DVT 溶栓和支架置入治疗的患者,并根据治疗次数(单次 vs 多次)将其分为两组。回顾手术记录和静脉造影,以确定进行的溶栓治疗次数和支架信息,包括支架的大小、位置、总数和治疗长度。终点包括总支架长度、30 天和长期通畅率以及血栓后综合征(Villalta 评分≥5)。采用 χ 检验、Logistic 回归和生存分析来确定结局。
共纳入 79 例接受溶栓和支架置入治疗的患者(6 例双侧介入;平均年龄 45.9±17 岁;48 例女性)。10 例(12 条肢体)接受了单阶段治疗,联合使用了机械溶栓和药物溶栓,其余 69 例(73 条肢体)接受了 2 至 4 次手术室联合使用机械溶栓和导管定向溶栓的治疗。接受单阶段手术的患者年龄更大,更有可能患有恶性疾病。与多阶段组相比,这些患者接受的组织型纤溶酶原激活物更少(17.2±2.2mg 比 27.6±11.6mg;P=0.008)。单阶段组的平均支架长度为 8.8±5.2cm,多阶段组为 9.2±4.6cm(P=0.764)。接受单阶段手术的患者的平均住院时间与接受多次手术的患者无差异(8.5 天比 5.9 天;P=0.269)。总的 30 天再血栓形成率为 7.3%。单阶段和多阶段的 2 年通畅率分别为 72.2%和 74.7%(P=0.909)。影响初始通畅丧失的主要预测因素是既往 DVT(风险比[HR],5.99;P=0.020)和不完全溶栓(HR,5.39;P=0.014),而非治疗次数(HR,0.957;P=0.966)。5 年时总体血栓后综合征发生率为 28.4%,也与治疗次数无关。
DVT 的单阶段与多阶段溶栓治疗在支架覆盖范围方面没有差异。只要溶栓完全,病变节段得到适当支架治疗,髂静脉支架置入术的通畅率仍然很高,与溶栓治疗次数无关。