• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颈静脉途径应用旋转装置行腔内血栓切除术治疗急性髂股型下肢深静脉血栓形成

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis Through a Jugular Approach with a Rotational Device.

机构信息

University Grenoble Alpes, Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.

Cardio-Vascular and Interventional Department, Antony Private Hospital, Antony, France.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Dec;46(12):1684-1693. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03529-4. Epub 2023 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00270-023-03529-4
PMID:37596417
Abstract

PURPOSE

To report the effectiveness of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) in the management of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) via the jugular vein using a slow rotation and large-tip device (SRD) in a large cohort of patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 2011 to 2021, 277 patients (mean age 45 years, 59.2% women) were treated in 6 centres with PCDT for ilio-fémoral DVT. PCDT was performed via the jugular vein and consisted of one session of fragmentation-fibrinolysis, aspiration and, if needed, angioplasty with stenting. The aim of PCDT was to achieve complete clearance of the venous thrombosis and to restore iliofemoral patency. Residual thrombotic load was assessed by angiography, venous patency by duplex ultrasound and clinical effectiveness by the rate of post-thrombotic syndrome (Villalta score > 4).

RESULTS

All patients were treated via the jugular vein using an SRD, and all but one were treated with fibrinolysis. Angioplasty with stenting was performed in 84.1% of patients. After the procedure, the residual thrombotic load at the ilio-fémoral region was < 10% in 96.1% of patients. The rate of major complications was 1.8% (n = 5), the rate of minor complications was 4% (n = 11), and one patient died from pulmonary embolism (0.4%) At a median follow-up of 24 months, primary and secondary iliofemoral patency was 89.6% and 95.8%, respectively. The rate of PTS was 13.8% at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

PCDT via the jugular vein using an SRD is an efficient treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT and results in high long-term venous patency and low PTS rates. Level of evidence Level 4, Case series.

摘要

目的

报告通过颈静脉使用缓慢旋转大尖端装置(SRD)对 277 例(平均年龄 45 岁,59.2%为女性)急性髂股深静脉血栓形成(DVT)患者进行药物机械性导管溶栓(PCDT)的效果。

材料与方法

2011 年至 2021 年,6 家中心对 277 例髂股 DVT 患者进行了 PCDT 治疗。PCDT 通过颈静脉进行,包括一次碎片溶栓、抽吸,如果需要,还进行血管成形术和支架置入。PCDT 的目的是完全清除静脉血栓并恢复髂股通畅。通过血管造影评估残余血栓负荷,通过双功能超声评估静脉通畅性,通过血栓后综合征(Villalta 评分>4)发生率评估临床疗效。

结果

所有患者均通过颈静脉使用 SRD 进行治疗,除 1 例外均接受溶栓治疗。84.1%的患者进行了血管成形术和支架置入。治疗后,96.1%的患者髂股区域残余血栓负荷<10%。主要并发症发生率为 1.8%(n=5),小并发症发生率为 4%(n=11),1 例患者死于肺栓塞(0.4%)。中位随访 24 个月时,原发和继发髂股通畅率分别为 89.6%和 95.8%。12 个月时血栓后综合征发生率为 13.8%。

结论

通过颈静脉使用 SRD 的 PCDT 是治疗急性髂股 DVT 的有效方法,可获得较高的长期静脉通畅率和较低的 PTS 发生率。证据等级 4,病例系列。

相似文献

1
Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis Through a Jugular Approach with a Rotational Device.经颈静脉途径应用旋转装置行腔内血栓切除术治疗急性髂股型下肢深静脉血栓形成
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Dec;46(12):1684-1693. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03529-4. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus AngioJet pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.导管溶栓与 AngioJet 机械溶栓导管治疗急性髂股深静脉血栓的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jan;12(1):101669. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
3
AngioJet Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy and Catheter Directed Thrombolysis vs. Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Alone for the Treatment of Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.AngioJet 机械血栓切除术与导管溶栓联合治疗与单独导管溶栓治疗髂股静脉血栓形成的疗效比较:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Oct;60(4):578-585. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
4
Post-Thrombotic Syndrome Morbidity in Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis of Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis.机械血栓切除术与药物机械性导管定向溶栓治疗髂股深静脉血栓形成后的血栓后综合征发病率
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Feb;111:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.11.007. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
5
Mechanical Thrombectomy vs. Pharmacomechanical Catheter Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Propensity Score Matched Exploratory Analysis of 12 Month Clinical Outcomes.机械血栓切除术与药物机械导管溶栓治疗髂股静脉血栓形成的比较:12 个月临床结局的倾向评分匹配探索性分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Apr;67(4):644-652. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.017. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
6
Midterm outcome of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with stenting for treatment of iliac vein compression syndrome with acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis.药物机械导管溶栓联合支架置入治疗髂静脉压迫综合征合并急性髂股深静脉血栓形成的中期结果。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Jan;8(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
The Long-Term Prognosis of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Left Iliofemoral Vein Thrombosis Combined with Left Iliac Vein Compression.急性左髂股静脉血栓形成合并左髂静脉受压患者血管内血栓切除术的长期预后
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Jan;110(Pt A):373-384. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.09.056. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
8
Predictors of Clinical Outcomes of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Trial.经导管药物溶栓治疗急性髂股静脉血栓形成的临床转归预测因素:多中心随机试验分析。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022 Oct;33(10):1161-1170.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.05.030. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
9
Correlation between Post-Procedure Residual Thrombus and Clinical Outcome in Deep Vein Thrombosis Patients Receiving Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis in a Multicenter Randomized Trial.多中心随机试验中接受药物机械溶栓治疗的深静脉血栓形成患者术后残余血栓与临床结局的相关性
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1517-1528.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
10
[Endovascular treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis - our results with catheter-directed thrombolysis and AngioJet].[急性髂股深静脉血栓形成的血管内治疗——我们采用导管直接溶栓和AngioJet的治疗结果]
Magy Seb. 2017 Mar;70(1):24-31. doi: 10.1556/1046.70.2017.1.4.

引用本文的文献

1
Phlegmasia Cerulea Dolens: A Rare Vascular Emergency.股青肿:一种罕见的血管急症。
Cureus. 2025 Jan 19;17(1):e77678. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77678. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Treatment of Chronic Calcified Endostent Venous Occlusion by Intravascular Lithotripsy.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Jun;47(6):843-846. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03710-3. Epub 2024 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Six-Month Deep Vein Thrombosis Outcomes by Chronicity: Analysis of the Real-World ClotTriever Outcomes Registry.按病程划分的六个月深静脉血栓形成结局:真实世界ClotTriever结局登记研究分析
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023 May;34(5):879-887.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.12.480.
2
Interim outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for deep vein thrombosis from the All-Comer CLOUT Registry.来自 All-Comer CLOUT 注册研究的机械血栓切除术治疗深静脉血栓的中期结果。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Jul;10(4):832-840.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.02.013. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
3
Experimental Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Aspiration-Based Techniques to Treat Different Types of Acute Thromboembolic Occlusions in the Femoropopliteal Vascular System Using an In Vitro Flow Model.
应用体外血流模型评估基于抽吸的技术治疗股腘血管系统不同类型急性血栓栓塞闭塞的有效性的实验研究。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Feb;45(2):228-235. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-03024-8. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
4
Catheter-Directed Thrombectomy for Highly Symptomatic Patients with Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis not Responsive to Conservative Treatment.经导管血栓切除术治疗对保守治疗无反应的症状性髂股深静脉血栓形成患者。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Apr;43(4):556-564. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02415-7. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Interventional Therapies for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Current Status and Principles for the Development of Novel Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.急性肺栓塞的介入治疗:现状与新型证据制定的原则:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2019 Nov 12;140(20):e774-e801. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000707. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
6
Single- versus multiple-stage catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis does not have an impact on iliac vein stent length or patency rates.急性髂股腘静脉血栓形成的单阶段与多阶段导管直接溶栓治疗对髂静脉支架长度或通畅率没有影响。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Nov;7(6):781-788. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
7
Endovascular Thrombus Removal for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis.急性髂股静脉血栓形成的血管内血栓切除术。
Circulation. 2019 Feb 26;139(9):1162-1173. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037425.
8
Meta-analysis and systematic review of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.经皮机械血栓切除术治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成的荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Nov;6(6):788-800. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.08.002.
9
Just How Attractive is the ATTRACT Trial?ATTRACT试验究竟有多有吸引力?
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Sep;41(9):1313-1317. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-2016-y. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
10
Cirse Quality Assurance Document and Standards for Classification of Complications: The Cirse Classification System.Cirse并发症分类的质量保证文件和标准:Cirse分类系统。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):1141-1146. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1703-4. Epub 2017 Jun 5.