Pasch James A, MacDermid Ewan, Pasch Lachlan B, Premaratne Chatika, Fok Kar Yin, Kotecha Krishna, El Khoury Toufic, Barto Walid
Department of Surgery, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Dec;89(12):1636-1641. doi: 10.1111/ans.15418. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
Positive circumferential resections are associated with local disease recurrence and reduced survival in rectal cancer. We studied a cohort of consecutive rectal cancer resections to assess for clinicopathological differences and survival in patients with positive and negative circumferential margins.
Rectal cancers were identified from a retrospective histopathology database of colorectal resections performed at five western Sydney hospitals from 2010 to 2016. Univariate and multivariate analysis with binary logistic regression were performed on histopathology data matched with survival times from the New South Wales Registry of Births Deaths and Marriages.
A total of 502 rectal cancer patients were identified including 66 (13.1%) with involved circumferential margins. Patients with positive and negative circumferential margins had a similar distribution of age, gender and use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Tumours with involved circumferential margin comprised 98.5% T3 and T4 disease of which 51.5% received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. These were significantly associated with metastatic disease, increasing tumour size, circumferential and perforated tumours on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified abdomino-perineal resection (odds ratio (OR) 3.35; P = 0.003), en-bloc multivisceral resection (OR 2.56; P = 0.032), T4 stage (OR 6.99; P < 0.001), perineural (OR 5.61; P < 0.001) and vascular invasion (OR 2.46; P = 0.022) as independent risk factors. Five-year survival was significantly worse for patients with involved circumferential margins (26% versus 69%; P < 0.001).
Circumferential margin status reflects not only technical success but also aggressive disease phenotypes which require adjuvant therapy. Further work is needed to determine whether omission of radiotherapy has had an effect on long-term outcomes in some of our at-risk patients.
直肠癌环周切缘阳性与局部疾病复发及生存率降低相关。我们研究了一组连续性直肠癌切除术患者,以评估环周切缘阳性和阴性患者的临床病理差异及生存率。
从2010年至2016年在悉尼西部五家医院进行的大肠切除术回顾性组织病理学数据库中识别出直肠癌。对与新南威尔士州出生、死亡和婚姻登记处的生存时间相匹配的组织病理学数据进行单因素和多因素二元逻辑回归分析。
共识别出502例直肠癌患者,其中66例(13.1%)环周切缘受累。环周切缘阳性和阴性患者在年龄、性别和新辅助放疗使用方面分布相似。环周切缘受累肿瘤中98.5%为T3和T4期疾病,其中51.5%接受了新辅助放疗。单因素分析显示,这些与转移性疾病、肿瘤大小增加、环周和穿孔性肿瘤显著相关。多因素分析确定腹会阴切除术(比值比(OR)3.35;P = 0.003)、整块多脏器切除术(OR 2.56;P = 0.032)、T4期(OR 6.99;P < 0.001)、神经周围(OR 5.61;P < 0.001)和血管侵犯(OR 2.46;P = 0.022)为独立危险因素。环周切缘受累患者的五年生存率显著更差(26%对69%;P < 0.001)。
环周切缘状态不仅反映技术成功,还反映需要辅助治疗的侵袭性疾病表型。需要进一步研究以确定放疗的省略是否对我们一些高危患者的长期结局产生了影响。