Cavicchioli Marco, Vassena Giulia, Movalli Mariagrazia, Maffei Cesare
Department of Psychology, University "Vita-Salute San Raffaele", Milan, Italy.
Unit of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, San Raffaele-Turro Hospital, Milan, Italy.
J Addict Dis. 2018 Jul-Dec;37(3-4):173-184. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2019.1643211. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
DSM-5 has included within the substance-related and addictive disorders diagnostic category behavioral addictions, such as gambling disorder. Some scholars also considered ICD-11 compulsive sex as a behavioral addiction. Furthermore, an addiction model of dysfunctional eating behaviors has been proposed. Consistently, the existence of common addiction mechanisms related to substance and non-substance related disorders has been hypothesized. Nevertheless, this approach was called into question, especially considering alternative processes which might be implicated in such conditions. This study aims to compare these opposite theoretical positions concerning substance- and nonsubstance related disorders, investigating the latent structure of addictive behaviors among alcohol use disorder (AUD) individuals. Addictive behaviors were self-reported assessed using the Shorter PROMIS Questionnaire (SPQ). We recruited 456 (59.2% male; 40.8% female) AUD treatment-seeking patients. Two latent structures were tested using a confirmatory factor analytic approach. We compared a one-factor (i.e., common addiction mechanisms) with a two-factor solution (i.e., dysregulation of reward processing systems and maladaptive coping strategies). The two-factor solution showed adequate goodness-of-fit indexes. Specifically, dysregulation of the reward processing systems dimension predicted the SPQ illicit and prescription drugs, gambling, and sex subscales. Conversely, the maladaptive coping strategies dimension predicted the SPQ compulsive buying, binge eating and food restriction subscales. The latent dimensions significantly correlated with each other. Compulsive sex might be preliminarily considered as a behavioral addiction. AUD individuals might show complex patterns of maladaptive behaviors functionally related to different latent processes. Differential treatment approaches are suggested to treat these conditions.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)已将行为成瘾纳入物质相关及成瘾性障碍诊断类别,如赌博障碍。一些学者还将《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD - 11)中的强迫性性行为视为一种行为成瘾。此外,有人提出了功能失调饮食行为的成瘾模型。一直以来,人们假设存在与物质相关和非物质相关障碍相关的共同成瘾机制。然而,这种方法受到了质疑,尤其是考虑到可能与此类情况相关的其他过程。本研究旨在比较关于物质相关和非物质相关障碍的这些相反理论观点,调查酒精使用障碍(AUD)个体中成瘾行为的潜在结构。成瘾行为通过使用简版患者报告结果测量信息系统问卷(SPQ)进行自我报告评估。我们招募了456名寻求AUD治疗的患者(男性占59.2%;女性占40.8%)。使用验证性因素分析方法测试了两种潜在结构。我们将单因素(即共同成瘾机制)与双因素解决方案(即奖励处理系统失调和适应不良应对策略)进行了比较。双因素解决方案显示出足够的拟合优度指标。具体而言,奖励处理系统维度失调预测了SPQ中的非法药物、处方药、赌博和性分量表。相反,适应不良应对策略维度预测了SPQ中的强迫性购物、暴饮暴食和食物限制分量表。这些潜在维度之间存在显著相关性。强迫性性行为可能初步被视为一种行为成瘾。AUD个体可能表现出与不同潜在过程功能相关的复杂适应不良行为模式。建议采用不同的治疗方法来治疗这些情况。