Modified Single-Patch versus Two-Patch Repair for Atrioventricular Septal Defect: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND

We performed a meta-analysis of studies to determine whether the modified single-patch technique offers benefits when compared to the two-patch repair. The postoperative outcomes examined in this study were cardiopulmonary bypass time, cross-clamp time, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay, total hospital length of stay, need for reoperation, need for reoperation for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction or left atrioventricular valve regurgitation, need for pacemaker implantation, and mortality during follow-up.

METHODS

A review was conducted to identify studies comparing a modified single-patch repair versus two-patch repair. A fixed-effects model was utilized for end points with low heterogeneity and a random-effects model for end points with significant heterogeneity. Meta-regression was also performed to determine the influence of other factors on the variables of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 964 unique manuscripts were screened, with 10 being included in the final analyses. There were a total of 724 patients, with 353 (49%) having undergone repair utilizing a modified single-patch repair. Mean age at repair for modified single-patch repair and two-patch repair was 8.81 and 9.03 months, respectively. Significant differences were noted in cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time with mean difference of -28.53 and -22.69 minutes, respectively. In comparison to the two-patch repair, both times were decreased in modified single-patch repair. No significant difference was noted in any other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified single-patch repair for atrioventricular septal defects requires less cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time but does not significantly impact the examined postoperative outcomes.