• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉疾病对经导管主动脉瓣植入治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄结局的影响。

Impact of coronary artery disease on outcomes of severe aortic stenosis treatment with transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

作者信息

Chodór Piotr, Wilczek Krzysztof, Włoch Łukasz, Przybylski Roman, Głowacki Jan, Kukulski Tomasz, Niklewski Tomasz, Zembala Marian, Gąsior Mariusz, Kalarus Zbigniew

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.

3 Department of Cardiology, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.

出版信息

Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2019;15(2):167-175. doi: 10.5114/aic.2019.84394. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

DOI:10.5114/aic.2019.84394
PMID:31497049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6727222/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may increase in-hospital and long-term mortality.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of CAD in patients who underwent TAVI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study group consisted of the first 142 patients treated with TAVI between 26 November 2008 and 31 December 2015. The patients were divided into two groups: group I comprised 103 (72.5%) patients with CAD, and group II comprised 39 (27.5%) patients without CAD.

RESULTS

Group I was characterized by a significantly higher risk according to EuroSCORE - 11.2 ±2.5 vs. 9 ±2.3 in group II ( < 0.001) and Logistic EuroSCORE - 25.4 ±13.4 vs. 16.3 ±8.7 ( < 0.001). 30-day mortality was 8 (7.8%) vs. 2 (5.1%) ( = NS) and 1-year mortality was 22 (21.4%) vs. 6 (15.4%) ( = NS) in group I and II respectively. The composite endpoint evaluating the efficacy of TAVI was achieved in 82 (79.6%) vs. 31 (79.5%) ( = NS) in group I and II respectively. The composite endpoint, which involved 30-day observation, occurred in 39 (37.86%) vs. 12 (30.77%) ( = NS) and the composite endpoint, which involved 1-year evaluation of the clinical efficacy of TAVI, occurred in 48 (57.8%) vs. 13 (48.1%) ( = NS) in patients with and without CAD respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The short- and mid-term outcomes of TAVI patients with CAD, despite higher risk profile, did not differ from the outcomes of treatment in patients without CAD.

摘要

引言

接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的患者中存在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)可能会增加住院和长期死亡率。

目的

评估CAD对接受TAVI患者的影响。

材料与方法

研究组由2008年11月26日至2015年12月31日期间接受TAVI治疗的前142例患者组成。患者分为两组:第一组包括103例(72.5%)患有CAD的患者,第二组包括39例(27.5%)无CAD的患者。

结果

根据欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE),第一组的风险显著更高——分别为11.2±2.5与第二组的9±2.3(P<0.001)以及逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(Logistic EuroSCORE)——25.4±13.4与16.3±8.7(P<0.001)。第一组和第二组的30天死亡率分别为8例(7.8%)与2例(5.1%)(P=无统计学差异),1年死亡率分别为22例(21.4%)与6例(15.4%)(P=无统计学差异)。评估TAVI疗效的复合终点在第一组和第二组中分别有82例(79.6%)与31例(79.5%)实现(P=无统计学差异)。涉及30天观察的复合终点在有CAD和无CAD的患者中分别有39例(37.86%)与12例(30.77%)出现(P=无统计学差异),而涉及TAVI临床疗效1年评估的复合终点在有CAD和无CAD的患者中分别有48例(57.8%)与13例(48.1%)出现(P=无统计学差异)。

结论

尽管CAD患者风险更高,但TAVI患者的短期和中期结果与无CAD患者的治疗结果并无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/6727222/3f48f42bdc33/PWKI-15-84394-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/6727222/7d2b44512512/PWKI-15-84394-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/6727222/737782b20f47/PWKI-15-84394-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/6727222/3f48f42bdc33/PWKI-15-84394-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/6727222/7d2b44512512/PWKI-15-84394-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/6727222/737782b20f47/PWKI-15-84394-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/6727222/3f48f42bdc33/PWKI-15-84394-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of coronary artery disease on outcomes of severe aortic stenosis treatment with transcatheter aortic valve implantation.冠状动脉疾病对经导管主动脉瓣植入治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄结局的影响。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2019;15(2):167-175. doi: 10.5114/aic.2019.84394. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
2
Influence of coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention on mid-term outcomes in patients with aortic valve stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者中冠状动脉疾病和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对中期结果的影响。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Aug;44(8):1089-1097. doi: 10.1002/clc.23655. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Comparison of early and late outcomes of TAVI alone compared to TAVI plus PCI in aortic stenosis patients with and without coronary artery disease.在合并或不合并冠状动脉疾病的主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,单纯经导管主动脉瓣置入术(TAVI)与TAVI联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的早期和晚期结果比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar 1;83(4):649-54. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25233. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation combined with elective coronary artery stenting: a simultaneous approach†.经导管主动脉瓣植入术联合择期冠状动脉支架置入术:一种同步治疗方法†
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jun;47(6):1083-9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu339. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
5
Effect of concomitant coronary artery disease on procedural and late outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.合并冠状动脉疾病对经导管主动脉瓣植入术的手术和晚期结果的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Mar;89(3):758-67; discussion 767. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.12.033.
6
Impact of Chronic Coronary Artery Disease and Revascularization Strategy in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.慢性冠状动脉疾病和血运重建策略对接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Nov 1;206:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.045. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
7
Complete revascularization is not a prerequisite for success in current transcatheter aortic valve implantation practice.在当前经导管主动脉瓣植入术实践中,完全血运重建并不是成功的必要条件。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):867-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
8
Impact of previous coronary artery revascularization on outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.既往冠状动脉血运重建对接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者预后的影响。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2023 Sep;19(3):243-250. doi: 10.5114/aic.2023.131477. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
9
Safety and effectiveness of a selective strategy for coronary artery revascularization before transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术前选择性冠状动脉血运重建策略的安全性和有效性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(2):376-83. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24434. Epub 2012 May 2.
10
Concomitant coronary intervention is associated with poorer early and late clinical outcomes in selected elderly patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve implantation.在部分接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术的老年患者中,同期进行冠状动脉介入治疗与较差的早期和晚期临床结局相关。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Jul;46(1):e1-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu187. Epub 2014 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging hybrid techniques in aortic valve interventions: A systematic review of integrating surgical and transcatheter approaches.主动脉瓣介入治疗中的新兴混合技术:手术与经导管方法整合的系统评价
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2025 Mar-Apr;19(2):66-77.
2
Long-Term Prognosis and Predictors of Mortality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的长期预后及死亡预测因素:一项回顾性分析
Cureus. 2023 Aug 31;15(8):e44432. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44432. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Female gender and the clinical and periprocedural profile and clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: experiences of a tertiary Polish centre.

本文引用的文献

1
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2017年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.
2
Concomitant coronary artery disease and its management in patients referred to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the POL-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的合并冠状动脉疾病及其管理:来自POL-TAVI注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 1;91(1):115-123. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27251. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
3
Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.
女性与经导管主动脉瓣植入术的临床及围手术期特征和临床结局:波兰一家三级中心的经验
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2020 Dec;16(4):436-443. doi: 10.5114/aic.2020.101769. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
中危患者的外科手术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 6;376(14):1321-1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700456. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
4
TAVR in Intermediate-Risk Patients: A Review of the PARTNER 2 Trial and its Future Implications.中度风险患者的经导管主动脉瓣置换术:PARTNER 2试验综述及其未来影响
J Heart Valve Dis. 2016 Nov;25(6):653-656.
5
Impact of Coronary Artery Disease Burden on 12-Month Mortality of Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.冠状动脉疾病负担对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后患者12个月死亡率的影响。
J Interv Cardiol. 2016 Aug;29(4):375-81. doi: 10.1111/joic.12308. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
6
Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: the U.K. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Registry.高危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的长期预后:英国经导管主动脉瓣植入登记研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 27;8(5):645-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.009.
7
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).2014 欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)心肌血运重建特别工作组。由欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)提供特别贡献制定。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):517-92. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu366. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
8
The German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY): in-hospital outcome.德国主动脉瓣注册研究(GARY):院内结局
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jun 21;35(24):1588-98. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht381. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
9
Severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease--implications for management in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era: a comprehensive review.严重主动脉瓣狭窄与冠状动脉疾病——经导管主动脉瓣置换时代的处理策略:全面综述。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jul 2;62(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.096. Epub 2013 May 1.
10
Predictors of one-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗重度症状性主动脉瓣狭窄一年后死亡率的预测因素。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;112(2):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 Apr 8.