Zhong Haoyu, Men Kuo, Wang Jiazhou, van Soest Johan, Rosenthal David, Dekker Andre, Zhang Zhen, Xiao Ying
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Front Oncol. 2019 Aug 21;9:792. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00792. eCollection 2019.
To investigate the impact of radiation treatment quality assurance (RTQA) on treatment outcomes in a phase III trial for advanced head and neck cancer. A total of 767 patients from NRG/RTOG 0522 were included in this study. The contours of target volume (TV) and organ at risk (OAR), and dose-volume coverage of targets were reviewed and scored (per-protocol, variation-acceptable and deviation-unacceptable) according to the protocol. We performed log-rank tests for RTQA scores with patients' outcomes, including local control (LC), distant control (DC) and overall survival (OS). Cox models with and without RTQA score data were established. To obtain a more reasonable model, per-protocol and variation acceptable were combined into a single acceptable score. The log-rank test showed that all RTQA scores correlated with LC, which was significantly different between the per-protocol and variation-acceptable patients in target and OAR contouring (-value = 0.004 and 0.043). For dose-volume score, the per-protocol and variation-acceptable patients were significantly different from unacceptable patients in the LC, with a -value = 0.020 and 0.006, respectively. The DC of patients with variation-acceptable was significantly different than that of the unacceptable patients (-value = 0.043). There were no correlations between RTQA scores with other outcomes. By incorporating RTQA scores into outcome modeling, the performance of LC model can be improved from 0.62 to 0.63 (c-index). The RTQA scores had no impact on DC and OS. RTQA scores are related to patients' local control rates in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
在一项针对晚期头颈癌的III期试验中,研究放射治疗质量保证(RTQA)对治疗结果的影响。本研究纳入了NRG/RTOG 0522研究中的767例患者。根据方案对靶区体积(TV)和危及器官(OAR)的轮廓以及靶区的剂量体积覆盖情况进行审查并评分(符合方案、变异可接受和偏差不可接受)。我们对RTQA评分与患者的治疗结果进行了对数秩检验,包括局部控制(LC)、远处控制(DC)和总生存期(OS)。建立了包含和不包含RTQA评分数据的Cox模型。为了获得更合理的模型,将符合方案和变异可接受合并为一个可接受评分。对数秩检验表明,所有RTQA评分均与LC相关,在靶区和OAR轮廓方面,符合方案和变异可接受的患者之间存在显著差异(P值=0.004和0.043)。对于剂量体积评分,符合方案和变异可接受的患者在LC方面与不可接受的患者存在显著差异,P值分别为0.020和0.006。变异可接受的患者的DC与不可接受的患者的DC存在显著差异(P值=0.043)。RTQA评分与其他结果之间无相关性。通过将RTQA评分纳入结果建模,LC模型的性能可从0.62提高到0.63(c指数)。RTQA评分对DC和OS无影响。RTQA评分与头颈癌放疗患者的局部控制率相关。