Voorham Jaco, Corradi Massimo, Papi Alberto, Vogelmeier Claus F, Singh Dave, Fabbri Leonardo M, Kerkhof Marjan, Kocks Janwillem H, Carter Victoria, Price David
Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Dept of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
ERJ Open Res. 2019 Aug 30;5(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00106-2019. eCollection 2019 Jul.
This real-world study compared the effectiveness of triple therapy (TT; long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs)/long-acting inhaled β-agonists (LABAs)/inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs)) dual bronchodilation (DB; LAMAs/LABAs) among patients with frequently exacerbating COPD. A matched historical cohort study was conducted using United Kingdom primary care data. Patients with COPD aged ≥40 years with a history of smoking were included if they initiated TT or DB from no maintenance/LAMA therapy and had two or more exacerbations in the preceding year. The primary outcome was time to first COPD exacerbation. Secondary outcomes included time to treatment failure, first acute respiratory event, and first acute oral corticosteroid (OCS) course. Potential treatment effect modifiers were investigated. In 1647 matched patients, initiation of TT reduced exacerbation risk (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-0.99), risk of acute respiratory event (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.84) and treatment failure (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.95) compared with DB. Risk reduction for acute respiratory events was greater for patients with higher rates of previous exacerbations. At baseline blood eosinophil counts (BECs) ≥ 0.35×10 cells·L, TT was associated with lower risk of OCS prescriptions than DB. This study provides real-life evidence of TT being more effective in reducing exacerbation risk than DB, which became more accentuated with increasing BEC and previous exacerbation rate.
这项真实世界研究比较了三联疗法(TT;长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)/长效吸入β受体激动剂(LABA)/吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS))与双重支气管扩张剂(DB;LAMA/LABA)在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)频繁急性加重患者中的疗效。利用英国初级保健数据进行了一项匹配历史队列研究。纳入年龄≥40岁、有吸烟史的COPD患者,这些患者从无维持治疗/LAMA治疗开始启动TT或DB,且在前一年有两次或更多次急性加重。主要结局是首次COPD急性加重的时间。次要结局包括治疗失败时间、首次急性呼吸事件和首次急性口服糖皮质激素(OCS)疗程。对潜在的治疗效果修饰因素进行了研究。在1647例匹配患者中,与DB相比,启动TT降低了急性加重风险(调整后风险比(HR)0.87,95%置信区间0.76-0.99)、急性呼吸事件风险(HR 0.74,95%置信区间0.66-0.84)和治疗失败风险(HR 0.83,95%置信区间0.73-0.95)。既往急性加重率较高的患者急性呼吸事件风险降低幅度更大。在基线血嗜酸性粒细胞计数(BEC)≥0.35×10⁹细胞/L时,与DB相比,TT与OCS处方风险较低相关。这项研究提供了现实生活中的证据,表明TT在降低急性加重风险方面比DB更有效,随着BEC和既往急性加重率的增加,这种差异更加明显。
ERJ Open Res. 2019-8-30
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2023
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025-8-20
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2023-7-24
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019-2-13
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018-11-6
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018-8-24
N Engl J Med. 2018-4-18
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017-8-15
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016-10-13