Lund Martin, Erichsen Rune, Njor Sisse Helle, Laurberg Søren, Valori Roland, Andersen Berit
Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital , Randers , Denmark.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;54(9):1176-1181. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1648548. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
Cecal intubation rate (CIR) is known to be inversely associated with interval colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Cecal intubation may be achieved by the use of force and sedation jeopardizing patient safety. The Performance Indicator of Colonic Intubation (PICI) is defined as the proportion of colonoscopies achieving cecal intubation with use of ≤2 mg midazolam and no-mild patient-experienced discomfort. We aimed (i) to measure the variation of PICI between colonoscopists and colonoscopy units; (ii) to assess the correlation between the individual components of PICI; and (iii) to evaluate the association between PICI and commonly used performance indicators. For the period 1 July 2015 through 30 June 2017 of the prevalent round of the Danish FIT-based CRC screening program, we included colonoscopies performed at four units in the Central Denmark Region within 60 days after a positive FIT-test. The PICI variation was evaluated using rates and ranges. Correlations between individual PICI components were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients. Polyp detection rate (PDR), Adenoma detection rate (ADR), Polyp retrieval rate (PRR) and Withdrawal time (WT) were assessed within PICI quartiles. The overall PICI was 78.7% with substantial variation between colonoscopists (40.0-91.9%) and units (72.6-82.0%). CIR was significantly correlated with patient-experienced comfort ( = 0.49, = 73, 0001) and we observed that colonoscopists with a PICI between 79.9% and 84.3%) had the highest ADR. We found a substantial variation in PICI between colonoscopists and between colonoscopy units, which may reflect potential for quality improvements.
已知盲肠插管率(CIR)与间隔期结直肠癌(CRC)风险呈负相关。通过使用暴力和镇静来实现盲肠插管可能会危及患者安全。结肠插管性能指标(PICI)的定义是在使用≤2毫克咪达唑仑且患者无轻度不适的情况下完成盲肠插管的结肠镜检查比例。我们旨在:(i)测量结肠镜检查医师和结肠镜检查单位之间PICI的差异;(ii)评估PICI各个组成部分之间的相关性;以及(iii)评估PICI与常用性能指标之间的关联。在丹麦基于粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)的CRC筛查计划的流行轮次中,从2015年7月1日至2017年6月30日,我们纳入了在丹麦中部地区四个单位进行的、在FIT检测呈阳性后60天内完成的结肠镜检查。使用比率和范围评估PICI差异。使用Pearson相关系数评估PICI各个组成部分之间的相关性。在PICI四分位数范围内评估息肉检出率(PDR)、腺瘤检出率(ADR)、息肉切除率(PRR)和退镜时间(WT)。总体PICI为78.7%,结肠镜检查医师之间(40.0 - 91.9%)和单位之间(72.6 - 82.0%)存在显著差异。CIR与患者体验到的舒适度显著相关(r = 0.49,p = 0.0001),并且我们观察到PICI在79.9%至84.3%之间的结肠镜检查医师具有最高的ADR。我们发现结肠镜检查医师之间以及结肠镜检查单位之间的PICI存在显著差异,这可能反映了质量改进的潜力。