• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparing weight loss outcomes by laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy; a systematic review and meta-analysis - Commentary.

作者信息

Agaba Emmanuel A

机构信息

Dept of Bariatric Surgery, Marietta Memorial Hospital, Marietta, OH, USA.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2019 Oct;70:92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.08.031. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.08.031
PMID:31499221
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Comparing weight loss outcomes by laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy; a systematic review and meta-analysis - Commentary.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的减肥效果比较：一项系统评价与荟萃分析——述评
Int J Surg. 2019 Oct;70:92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.08.031. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
2
Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss in Patients With Morbid Obesity: The SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术对病态肥胖患者体重减轻的影响：SM-BOSS随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Jan 16;319(3):255-265. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20897.
3
An invited commentary on "Comparative analysis of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 18 studies" (Int J Surg 2020; 76: 101-110).一篇受邀评论，评论对象为《腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术在减重及合并症缓解方面的比较分析：基于18项研究的系统评价与荟萃分析》（《国际外科学杂志》2020年；76卷：101 - 110页）
Int J Surg. 2020 Jun;78:9-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
4
Comment on: "Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an audit of 34 patients" and "Weight loss, weight regain, and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-10-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy".评论：“袖状胃切除术转为Roux-en-Y胃旁路术：34例患者的审计”以及“体重减轻、体重反弹和转为Roux-en-Y胃旁路术——腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的10年结果”
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Nov;12(9):1651-1654. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.03.028. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
5
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy to Treat Morbid Obesity-Related Comorbidities: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖相关合并症：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Obes Surg. 2016 Feb;26(2):429-42. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1996-9.
6
An invited commentary on 'Comparative analysis of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 18 studies' (Int J Surg 2020;76:101-110) - Need for re-examining.一篇关于《腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术减肥效果及合并症缓解情况的比较分析：基于18项研究的系统评价与荟萃分析》（《国际外科学杂志》2020年；76卷：第101 - 110页）的特邀评论——需重新审视。
Int J Surg. 2020 Jul;79:64-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.030. Epub 2020 May 15.
7
An Invited Commentary on "Comparative analysis of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 18 studies" (Int J Surg 2020;76:101-110) - Time for shared decision making.关于《腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术在减重及合并症缓解方面的比较分析：基于18项研究的系统评价与荟萃分析》（《国际外科学杂志》2020年；76卷：101 - 110页）的特邀评论——共同决策的时机
Int J Surg. 2020 May;77:128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.056. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
8
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy achieve comparable weight loss at 1 year.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术在1年内实现的体重减轻效果相当。
Am Surg. 2012 Dec;78(12):1325-8.
9
Laparoscopic revision of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to sleeve gastrectomy: A ray of hope for failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.腹腔镜下将Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术修正为袖状胃切除术：为失败的Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术带来一线希望。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2016 May;9(2):122-7. doi: 10.1111/ases.12277. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
10
Comparing the Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Severe Obesity.比较袖状胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术治疗重度肥胖的效果。
JAMA. 2018 Jan 16;319(3):235-237. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20449.