Yaghoubian Arezou, Tolan Amy, Stabile Bruce E, Kaji Amy H, Belzberg Gary, Mun Edward, Zane Robert
Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente South Bay Medical Center, Harbor City, California, USA.
Am Surg. 2012 Dec;78(12):1325-8.
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has gained popularity as a weight loss surgical option for morbidly obese patients. Although initial studies have shown weight loss and comorbidity resolution comparable to those after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), many of these studies are limited by the small patient size. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic RYGB. A retrospective chart review of all morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic RYGB or sleeve gastrectomy between 2007 and 2009 at an HMO hospital was conducted. Data points collected included age, gender, completion of a preoperative weight loss program, initial body mass index (BMI), pre- and postoperative weights, and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), osteoarthritis, obstructive sleep apnea, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Outcomes measures included excess weight loss, resolution of comorbidities, postoperative complications, and mortality. A total of 345 laparoscopic RYGBs and 192 sleeve gastrectomies were performed. On average, the patients who received RYGB were younger (46 vs 48 years, P = 0.05) and had higher BMI (47 vs 43 kg/m(2), P < 0.0001). There was a higher incidence of DM in the RYGB group (32 vs 22%, P = 0.01), whereas the incidences of HTN and GERD were similar in both surgical groups. Ninety-three per cent of the patients who underwent RYGB and 90 per cent of the patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy completed a preoperative weight loss program. The median length of hospital stay for both groups was 3 days. The complication rate in both groups was 9 per cent. The incidence of gastric leak was 1 per cent in both groups. There was only one mortality, which occurred in the RYGB group. The postoperative resolution of DM was comparable in both groups. The RYGB group had greater resolution of HTN (48 vs 34%, P = 0.03) and GERD (73 vs 34%, P < 0.0001). At 12 months, sleeve gastrectomy achieved superior excess weight loss compared with RYGB (72 vs 61%, P = 0.0015). After adjusting for age and BMI, the excess weight loss for RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy was similar at 12 months (t parameter estimate -0.06, P = 0.08). Laparoscopic RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy had comparable postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. At 1 year, sleeve gastrectomy achieved only slightly greater weight loss. The two operations are both legitimate standalone bariatric procedures and their applications need to be based on individual patient characteristics and needs.
腹腔镜袖状胃切除术已成为肥胖症患者减肥手术的热门选择。尽管初步研究表明,其减重效果和合并症缓解情况与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)相当,但许多此类研究因样本量小而受到限制。因此,本研究旨在比较腹腔镜袖状胃切除术和腹腔镜RYGB的疗效。对2007年至2009年在一家健康维护组织(HMO)医院接受腹腔镜RYGB或袖状胃切除术的所有肥胖症患者进行了回顾性病历审查。收集的数据点包括年龄、性别、术前减肥计划的完成情况、初始体重指数(BMI)、术前和术后体重,以及糖尿病(DM)、高血压(HTN)、骨关节炎、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和胃食管反流病(GERD)的存在情况。疗效指标包括超重减轻、合并症缓解、术后并发症和死亡率。共进行了345例腹腔镜RYGB手术和192例袖状胃切除术。平均而言,接受RYGB的患者更年轻(46岁对48岁,P = 0.05),BMI更高(47对43 kg/m²,P < 0.0001)。RYGB组DM的发生率更高(32%对22%,P = 0.01),而两个手术组中HTN和GERD的发生率相似。接受RYGB的患者中有93%和接受袖状胃切除术的患者中有90%完成了术前减肥计划。两组的中位住院时间均为3天。两组的并发症发生率均为9%。两组胃漏的发生率均为1%。仅发生1例死亡,发生在RYGB组。两组术后DM的缓解情况相当。RYGB组HTN(48%对34%,P = 0.03)和GERD(73%对34%,P < 0.0001)的缓解情况更好。在12个月时,袖状胃切除术的超重减轻效果优于RYGB(72%对61%,P = 0.0015)。在调整年龄和BMI后,RYGB和袖状胃切除术在12个月时的超重减轻情况相似(t参数估计值为-0.06,P = 0.08)。腹腔镜RYGB和袖状胃切除术的术后发病率和死亡率相当。在1年时,袖状胃切除术的减重效果仅略好。这两种手术都是合理的独立减肥手术,其应用需要根据患者的个体特征和需求来决定。