• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偏见、特权与权力:可识别群体之间的冲突与合作。

Prejudice, privilege, and power: Conflicts and cooperation between recognizable groups.

作者信息

Bingham Jeremy, Landi Pietro, Hui Cang

机构信息

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Matieland 7602, South Africa.

African Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Cape Town 7945, South Africa.

出版信息

Math Biosci Eng. 2019 May 9;16(5):4092-4106. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019203.

DOI:10.3934/mbe.2019203
PMID:31499652
Abstract

The problem of cooperation remains one of the fundamental questions in the fields of biology, sociology, and economics. The emergence and maintenance of cooperation are naturally affected by group dynamics, since individuals are likely to behave differently based on shared group membership. We here formulate a model of socio-economic power between two prejudiced groups, and explore the conditions for their cooperative coexistence under two social scenarios in a well-mixed environment. Each scenario corresponds to an asymmetrical increase in the payoffs for mutual cooperation in either cross-group or within-group interactions. In the 'inter-dependence' scenario payoffs of cross-group cooperation are enhanced, while in the 'group-cohesion' scenario payoffs of within-group cooperation are enhanced. We find that stable cooperative coexistence is possible only in the inter-dependence scenario. The conditions for such coexistence are highly sensitive to prejudice, defined as the reduction in probability for cross-group cooperation, and less sensitive to privilege, defined as the enhancements to payoffs of cross-group cooperation.

摘要

合作问题仍然是生物学、社会学和经济学领域的基本问题之一。合作的出现和维持自然会受到群体动态的影响,因为个体可能会基于共同的群体成员身份而表现出不同的行为。我们在此构建了两个存在偏见的群体之间的社会经济权力模型,并在一个充分混合的环境中,探讨了两种社会情景下它们合作共存的条件。每种情景对应着跨群体或群体内部互动中相互合作收益的不对称增加。在“相互依赖”情景中,跨群体合作的收益得到增强,而在“群体凝聚力”情景中,群体内部合作的收益得到增强。我们发现,只有在相互依赖情景中才可能实现稳定的合作共存。这种共存的条件对偏见高度敏感,偏见被定义为跨群体合作概率的降低,而对特权的敏感度较低,特权被定义为跨群体合作收益的增强。

相似文献

1
Prejudice, privilege, and power: Conflicts and cooperation between recognizable groups.偏见、特权与权力:可识别群体之间的冲突与合作。
Math Biosci Eng. 2019 May 9;16(5):4092-4106. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019203.
2
Collapse of cooperation in evolving games.进化博弈中合作的瓦解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 9;111(49):17558-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408618111. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
3
Sparse cliques trump scale-free networks in coordination and competition.稀疏聚类在协调和竞争中胜过无标度网络。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 22;6:21870. doi: 10.1038/srep21870.
4
Interaction times change evolutionary outcomes: Two-player matrix games.交互时间改变进化结果:双人矩阵博弈
J Theor Biol. 2017 Mar 7;416:199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
5
Individual variation evades the prisoner's dilemma.个体差异规避了囚徒困境。
BMC Evol Biol. 2002 Sep 10;2:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-2-15.
6
Survivor's dilemma: The evolution of cooperation in volatile environments.幸存者困境:易变环境中的合作进化。
J Theor Biol. 2021 May 7;516:110603. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110603. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
7
A simple rule of direct reciprocity leads to the stable coexistence of cooperation and defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.在囚徒困境博弈中,一条简单的直接互惠规则导致了合作与背叛的稳定共存。
J Theor Biol. 2017 May 7;420:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.02.036. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
8
Environment-based preference selection promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game.基于环境的偏好选择促进空间囚徒困境博弈中的合作。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 23;8(1):15616. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34116-0.
9
Game theory in models of pedestrian room evacuation.行人房间疏散模型中的博弈论。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Mar;89(3):032806. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.032806. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
10
Evolutionary games and population dynamics: maintenance of cooperation in public goods games.进化博弈与种群动态:公共物品博弈中合作的维持
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2565-70. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3600.