van der Stouwe Elisabeth C D, van Busschbach Jooske T, Opmeer Esther M, de Vries Bertine, Marsman Jan-Bernard C, Aleman André, Pijnenborg Gerdina H M
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center of Psychiatry, Rob Giel Onderzoekcentrum, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 2, 9713 AW, Groningen, the Netherlands.
NPJ Schizophr. 2019 Sep 9;5(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41537-019-0082-z.
Individuals with psychosis are at an increased risk of victimization. Processing of facial expressions has been suggested to be associated with victimization in this patient group. Especially processing of angry expressions may be relevant in the context of victimization. Therefore, differences in brain activation and connectivity between victimized and nonvictimized patients during processing of angry faces were investigated. Thirty-nine patients, of whom nineteen had experienced threats, assaults, or sexual violence in the past 5 years, underwent fMRI scanning, during which they viewed angry and neutral facial expressions. Using general linear model (GLM) analyses, generalized psychophysiological (gPPI) analysis and independent component analyses (ICA) differences in brain activation and connectivity between groups in response to angry faces were investigated. Whereas differences in regional brain activation GLM and gPPI analyses yielded no differences between groups, ICA revealed more deactivation of the sensorimotor network in victimized participants. Deactivation of the sensorimotor network in response to angry faces in victimized patients, might indicate a freeze reaction to threatening stimuli, previously observed in traumatized individuals.
患有精神病的个体遭受伤害的风险更高。面部表情处理被认为与该患者群体的受害情况有关。特别是愤怒表情的处理在受害情境中可能具有相关性。因此,研究了受害患者和未受害患者在处理愤怒面孔时大脑激活和连通性的差异。39名患者,其中19名在过去5年中经历过威胁、攻击或性暴力,接受了功能磁共振成像扫描,在此期间他们观看愤怒和中性的面部表情。使用一般线性模型(GLM)分析、广义心理生理交互作用(gPPI)分析和独立成分分析(ICA)研究了两组在面对愤怒面孔时大脑激活和连通性的差异。虽然GLM和gPPI分析显示区域大脑激活的差异在两组之间没有差异,但ICA显示受害参与者的感觉运动网络去激活更多。受害患者对愤怒面孔的感觉运动网络去激活,可能表明对威胁刺激的冻结反应,这在受过创伤的个体中曾被观察到。