Suppr超能文献

比较持续非卧床腹膜透析和自动化腹膜透析治疗的腹膜透析患者的钠清除率。

Comparison of sodium removal in peritoneal dialysis patients treated by continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis.

机构信息

UCL Department of Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.

出版信息

J Nephrol. 2019 Dec;32(6):1011-1019. doi: 10.1007/s40620-019-00646-7. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal fluid balance for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients requires both water and sodium removal. Previous studies have variously reported that continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) removes more or equivalent amounts of sodium than automated PD (APD) cyclers. We therefore wished to determine peritoneal dialysate losses with different PD treatments.

METHODS

Peritoneal and urinary sodium losses were measured in 24-h collections of urine and PD effluent in patients attending for their first assessment of peritoneal membrane function. We adjusted fluid and sodium losses for CAPD patients for the flush before fill technique.

RESULTS

We reviewed the results from 659 patients, mean age 57 ± 16 years, 56.3% male, 38.9% diabetic, 24.0% treated by CAPD, 22.5% by APD and 53.5% APD with a day-time exchange, with icodextrin prescribed to 72.8% and 22.7 g/L glucose to 31.7%. Ultrafiltration was greatest for CAPD 650 (300-1100) vs 337 (103-598) APD p < 0.001, vs 474 (171-830) mL/day for APD with a day exchange. CAPD removed most sodium 79 (33-132) vs 23 (- 2 to 51) APD p < 0.001, and 51 (9-91) for APD with a day exchange, and after adjustment for the CAPD flush before fill 57 (20-113), p < 0.001 vs APD. APD patients with a day exchanged used more hypertonic glucose dialysates [0 (0-5) vs CAPD 0 (0-1) L], p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

CAPD provides greater ultrafiltration and sodium removal than APD cyclers, even after adjusting for the flush-before fill, despite greater hypertonic usage by APD cyclers. Ultrafiltration volume and sodium removal were similar between CAPD and APD with a day fill.

摘要

背景

腹膜透析(PD)患者的最佳液体平衡需要同时去除水和钠。先前的研究报告称,持续非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)比自动化 PD(APD)循环机去除更多或等量的钠。因此,我们希望确定不同 PD 治疗方法的腹膜透析液损失。

方法

在首次评估腹膜膜功能的患者中,通过 24 小时尿液和 PD 流出物收集测量腹膜和尿钠损失。我们为接受 CAPD 患者的预充前冲洗技术调整了液体和钠的损失。

结果

我们回顾了 659 名患者的结果,平均年龄 57±16 岁,56.3%为男性,38.9%为糖尿病患者,24.0%接受 CAPD 治疗,22.5%接受 APD 治疗,53.5%接受 APD 日间交换治疗,72.8%患者使用了艾考糊精,31.7%患者使用 22.7g/L 葡萄糖。CAPD 的超滤量最大,为 650(300-1100)vs 337(103-598)APD,p<0.001,APD 日间交换为 474(171-830)mL/天。CAPD 去除的钠最多,为 79(33-132)vs 23(-2 至 51)APD,p<0.001,APD 日间交换为 51(9-91),在调整 CAPD 的预充前冲洗后,为 57(20-113),p<0.001 vs APD。APD 患者的日间交换使用了更多的高渗葡萄糖透析液[0(0-5)vs CAPD 0(0-1)L],p<0.001。

结论

即使在调整预充前冲洗后,CAPD 也比 APD 循环机提供更大的超滤和钠去除量,尽管 APD 循环机的高渗使用率更高。CAPD 和 APD 日间填充的超滤量和钠去除量相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c520/6821665/244b2dd29333/40620_2019_646_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验