Neri L, Viglino G, Cappelletti A, Gandolfo C, Cavalli P L
Nephrology and Dialysis Service, San Lazzaro Hospital, Alba, Italy.
Adv Perit Dial. 2000;16:174-6.
Icodextrins (Icos) produce constant linear ultrafiltration (UF). This effect allows Icos to replace glucose during long dwells in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis [CAPD (nighttime)] and automated peritoneal dialysis [APD (daytime)]. However, the effectiveness of Icos in producing UF (IcoUF) is limited by lymphatic reabsorption, whose extent depends partly on posture and physical activity. This paper aims to assess whether the difference in posture and physical activity between daytime dwells in APD and nighttime dwells in CAPD affects IcoUF. Patients undergoing first treatment were retrospectively examined. Ten patients were on CAPD [4 males, 6 females; average age, 73.0 +/- 13.4 years; body surface area (BSA), 1.63 +/- 0.21 m2; total volume per day, 5.6 +/- 1.9 L], and ten were on APD (7 males, 3 females; average age, 67.7 +/- 9.8; BSA, 1.75 +/- 0.22 m2; total volume per night, 10.5 +/- 0.9 L). Ultrafiltration was assessed for seven consecutive days preceding a peritoneal equilibration test (PET) and collection of diuresis. In both groups, 3 patients had no diuresis, and the difference between CAPD and APD was not significant (625 +/- 762 mL vs 780 +/- 878 mL). Moreover, no significant difference was seen in 4-hour dialysate-to-plasma creatinine (D/P) between CAPD (0.65 +/- 0.12) and APD (0.64 +/- 0.05). Dwell times with Icos were shorter in CAPD than in APD (11.5 +/- 1.8 hours vs 14.8 +/- 0.5 hours, p < 0.0005), but the fill volume was not significantly different (1760 +/- 286 mL vs 1790 +/- 249 mL). Water excretion owing to diuresis and dialysis [total water excretion (TWE): 1619 +/- 497 mL CAPD vs 1762 +/- 736 mL APD] and dialytic UF (363 +/- 443 mL CAPD vs 748 +/- 479 mL APD), which is not linked to Icos, were not significantly different between the two groups. The IcoUF and the percentage of IcoUF to TWE were significantly higher in CAPD compared to APD [631 +/- 253 mL (44% +/- 27%) vs 234 +/- 215 mL (19% +/- 19%), p < 0.001 (p < 0.05)]. In conclusion, an upright posture and physical activity seem to produce less IcoUF in APD despite the longer dwell. These factors could, indeed, produce greater intraperitoneal pressure, resulting in increased lymphatic reabsorption during a daytime dwell.
艾考糊精(Icos)可产生持续的线性超滤(UF)。这一作用使得Icos能够在持续非卧床腹膜透析[CAPD(夜间)]和自动化腹膜透析[APD(日间)]的长时间留腹过程中替代葡萄糖。然而,Icos产生超滤(IcoUF)的效果受到淋巴重吸收的限制,其程度部分取决于体位和身体活动。本文旨在评估APD日间留腹与CAPD夜间留腹之间体位和身体活动的差异是否会影响IcoUF。对接受首次治疗的患者进行回顾性研究。10例患者接受CAPD治疗[4例男性,6例女性;平均年龄73.0±13.4岁;体表面积(BSA)1.63±0.21 m²;每日总量5.6±1.9 L],10例患者接受APD治疗(7例男性,3例女性;平均年龄67.7±9.8岁;BSA 1.75±0.22 m²;每晚总量10.5±0.9 L)。在腹膜平衡试验(PET)和收集尿液前连续7天评估超滤情况。两组中均有3例患者无尿液生成,CAPD组与APD组之间差异无统计学意义(625±762 mL对780±878 mL)。此外,CAPD组(0.65±0.12)与APD组(0.64±0.05)之间4小时透析液与血浆肌酐比值(D/P)差异无统计学意义。CAPD组使用Icos的留腹时间短于APD组(11.5±1.8小时对14.8±0.5小时,p<0.0005),但灌入量差异无统计学意义(1760±286 mL对1790±249 mL)。两组间因尿液生成和透析导致的水排泄量[总水排泄量(TWE):CAPD组1619±497 mL对APD组1762±736 mL]以及与Icos无关的透析超滤量(CAPD组363±443 mL对APD组748±479 mL)差异无统计学意义。与APD组相比,CAPD组的IcoUF及IcoUF占TWE的百分比显著更高[631±253 mL(44%±27%)对234±215 mL(19%±19%),p<0.001(p<0.05)]。总之,尽管APD留腹时间更长,但直立体位和身体活动似乎会使APD中的IcoUF减少。这些因素确实可能导致腹腔内压力升高,从而使日间留腹期间淋巴重吸收增加。