Abrutyn Seth, Mueller Anna S
Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Death Stud. 2021;45(7):522-527. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1660081. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
Suicidology is at a crossroads, the crux of which came into plain view recently when Hjelmeland/Knizek's critique of mainstream suicidology was followed by two ardent essays defending suicidology as it currently exists. We stake out a middle-way approach leveraging sociology's unique disciplinary perspective to bridge the two sides to construct a robust transdisciplinary toolbox that helps suicidology advance as science and improve how we study suicide and, therefore, what we know. The essay first examines the underlying structural and cultural reasons for the talking past each other, before turning towards our own understanding of science, methods, and the study of suicide.
自杀学正处于一个十字路口,其关键问题最近变得清晰可见,当时赫耶梅兰德/克尼泽克对主流自杀学的批评之后,紧接着有两篇热情洋溢的文章为当前存在的自杀学进行辩护。我们提出一种中间路线的方法,利用社会学独特的学科视角来弥合双方分歧,构建一个强大的跨学科工具箱,以帮助自杀学作为一门科学取得进展,并改进我们研究自杀的方式,进而增进我们对自杀的了解。本文首先考察了双方各说各话的潜在结构和文化原因,然后转向我们自己对科学、方法以及自杀研究的理解。