• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术在青少年自杀倾向的连续护理中的作用:系统评价。

The Role of Technology and the Continuum of Care for Youth Suicidality: Systematic Review.

机构信息

School of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.

The Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, Saint Louis, MO, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e18672. doi: 10.2196/18672.

DOI:10.2196/18672
PMID:33034568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7584980/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Youth suicide is a global public health issue, and using technology is one strategy to increase participation in preventive interventions. However, there is minimal knowledge on how technology-enhanced interventions for youth correspond to the stages of care, from illness or risk recognition to treatment follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to examine the efficacy of technology-enhanced youth suicide prevention and interventions across the continuum of care.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched up to spring 2019 for youth suicide preventive interventions that used technology. The review was not restricted by study design and eligible studies could report outcomes on suicidality or related behaviors, such as formal treatment initiation. An adapted version of the Methodological Quality Ratings Scale was used to assess study quality.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies were identified. The findings support the emerging efficacy of technology-enhanced interventions, including a decline in suicidality and an increase in proactive behaviors. However, evidence suggests that there are gaps in the continuum of care and recent study samples do not represent the diverse identities of vulnerable youth.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of identified studies were conducted in school settings and were universal interventions that aligned with the illness and risk recognition and help-seeking stages of the continuum of care. This field could be strengthened by having future studies target the stages of assessment and treatment initiation, include diverse youth demographics, and examine the varying roles of providers and technological components in emerging interventions.

摘要

背景

青年自杀是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,利用技术是增加参与预防干预措施的一种策略。然而,对于技术增强型干预措施如何对应从疾病或风险识别到治疗随访的护理连续体,知之甚少。

目的

本系统评价旨在检查跨越护理连续体的技术增强型青年自杀预防和干预措施的疗效。

方法

截至 2019 年春季,在四个电子数据库中搜索使用技术的青年自杀预防干预措施。该综述不受研究设计的限制,合格的研究可以报告自杀倾向或相关行为(如正式治疗开始)的结果。使用经过改编的方法学质量评分量表来评估研究质量。

结果

共确定了 26 项研究。研究结果支持技术增强型干预措施的疗效不断增强,包括自杀率下降和积极行为增加。然而,有证据表明,护理连续体存在差距,并且最近的研究样本不能代表弱势青年的多样化身份。

结论

大多数确定的研究都是在学校环境中进行的,是与护理连续体的疾病和风险识别以及寻求帮助阶段一致的普遍性干预措施。通过未来的研究针对评估和治疗开始阶段、包括不同青年人群体以及检查提供者和技术组件在新兴干预措施中的不同作用,可以加强这一领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1efa/7584980/35b3f539570b/jmir_v22i10e18672_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1efa/7584980/35b3f539570b/jmir_v22i10e18672_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1efa/7584980/35b3f539570b/jmir_v22i10e18672_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Role of Technology and the Continuum of Care for Youth Suicidality: Systematic Review.技术在青少年自杀倾向的连续护理中的作用:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e18672. doi: 10.2196/18672.
2
Innovating Technology-Enhanced Interventions for Youth Suicide: Insights for Measuring Implementation Outcomes.创新青少年自杀的技术强化干预措施:衡量实施成果的见解
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 3;12:657303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657303. eCollection 2021.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
5
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of suicide prevention in high-schools and universities: a research agenda for evidence-based practice.高中和大学自杀预防的系统评价与叙述性综合:基于证据实践的研究议程
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):1116. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11124-w.
6
Effectiveness of a Continuity-of-Care Model to Reduce Youth Suicidality.连续性护理模式对降低青少年自杀率的效果。
Crisis. 2022 Dec;43(6):486-492. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000818. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
7
A systematic review of psychosocial suicide prevention interventions for youth.青少年心理社会自杀预防干预措施的系统评价。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 May;25(5):467-82. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0783-4. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
8
Annual Research Review: Suicide among youth - epidemiology, (potential) etiology, and treatment.年度研究综述:青少年自杀——流行病学、(潜在)病因学和治疗。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;59(4):460-482. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12831. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
9
Qualitative study of suicidality and help-seeking behaviors in African American adolescents.非裔美国青少年自杀倾向与求助行为的定性研究
Am J Community Psychol. 2007 Sep;40(1-2):52-63. doi: 10.1007/s10464-007-9122-3.
10
The Use of Close Friends on Instagram, Help-Seeking Willingness, and Suicidality Among Hong Kong Youth: Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.《香港青年使用 Instagram 的亲密朋友、求助意愿与自杀倾向:探索性序贯混合方法研究》
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 12;24(10):e37695. doi: 10.2196/37695.

引用本文的文献

1
Health workers' perception of digital technology use to improve mental health services.卫生工作者对使用数字技术改善心理健康服务的看法。
J Public Health Afr. 2025 Jun 13;16(1):1337. doi: 10.4102/jphia.v16i1.1337. eCollection 2025.
2
Scoping review on prevention of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in adolescents: methods, effectiveness and future directions.青少年自杀念头和行为预防的范围综述:方法、有效性及未来方向
Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 10;3:1367075. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2024.1367075. eCollection 2024.
3
Teletherapy and Medication Management of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder with Co-occurring Internalizing Symptoms and Suicidality During the Pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Youth Self Report Thought Problems and Sleep Difficulties Are Linked to Suicidal Ideation Among Psychiatrically Hospitalized Adolescents.青少年自评思维问题和睡眠困难与住院青少年的自杀意念有关。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2020 Oct;30(8):522-525. doi: 10.1089/cap.2019.0160. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
2
Expanding our paradigms: Intersectional and socioecological approaches to suicide prevention.拓展我们的范式:预防自杀的交叉性和社会生态方法。
Death Stud. 2022;46(1):224-232. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1725934. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
3
Children Are Different: Liability Issues in Working With Suicidal and Dangerous Youths.
大流行期间注意缺陷多动障碍合并内化症状和自杀倾向的远程治疗与药物管理
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2024;45(6):e599-e601. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001324. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
4
Suicide in young people: screening, risk assessment, and intervention.年轻人的自杀:筛查、风险评估和干预。
BMJ. 2023 Apr 24;381:e070630. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070630.
5
Stakeholder perspectives on digital behavioral health applications targeting adolescent depression and suicidality: Policymaker, provider, and community insights.利益相关者对针对青少年抑郁症和自杀倾向的数字行为健康应用的看法:政策制定者、提供者和社区的见解。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Sep 7;3:26334895221120796. doi: 10.1177/26334895221120796. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
6
Information and communication technology-based interventions for suicide prevention implemented in clinical settings: a scoping review.基于信息和通信技术的预防自杀临床干预措施:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09254-5.
7
Technological and Digital Interventions for Mental Health and Wellbeing: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.心理健康与幸福的技术和数字干预:系统评价概述
Front Digit Health. 2021 Dec 23;3:754337. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.754337. eCollection 2021.
8
Innovating Technology-Enhanced Interventions for Youth Suicide: Insights for Measuring Implementation Outcomes.创新青少年自杀的技术强化干预措施:衡量实施成果的见解
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 3;12:657303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657303. eCollection 2021.
儿童与众不同:与有自杀倾向及危险的青少年合作中的责任问题。
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2019 Oct;17(4):355-359. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190018. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
4
Perspectives on the HIV continuum of care among adult opioid users in New York City: a qualitative study.纽约市成年阿片类药物使用者中 HIV 连续护理的观点:一项定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2019 Oct 12;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0329-z.
5
Toward a robust science of suicide: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological considerations in advancing suicidology.迈向一门健全的自杀科学:推进自杀学的认识论、理论和方法论考量
Death Stud. 2021;45(7):522-527. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1660081. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
6
Impact of an online depression prevention intervention on suicide risk factors for adolescents and young adults.在线抑郁症预防干预对青少年和青年自杀风险因素的影响。
Mhealth. 2019 May 7;5:11. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2019.04.01. eCollection 2019.
7
Coping long term with active suicide in adolescents: Results from a pilot randomized controlled trial.青少年主动自杀的长期应对:一项试点随机对照试验的结果
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;24(4):847-859. doi: 10.1177/1359104519843956. Epub 2019 May 8.
8
Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency.性别差距是由于对申请人的评价还是科学本身造成的?来自一个国家资助机构的自然实验。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):531-540. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32611-4.
9
Measuring the Implementation of Behavioral Intervention Technologies: Recharacterization of Established Outcomes.衡量行为干预技术的实施情况:对既定结果的重新界定。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 25;21(1):e11752. doi: 10.2196/11752.
10
Association of Treatment Delays With Survival for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.治疗延迟与头颈部癌症患者生存的关系:系统评价。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Feb 1;145(2):166-177. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2716.