Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Cancer. 2019 Dec 1;125(23):4278-4293. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32457. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
Despite increasing utilization of proton-beam therapy (PBT) in the postprostatectomy setting, no data exist regarding toxicity outcomes relative to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The authors compared acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC) who received treatment with postprostatectomy IMRT versus PBT.
With institutional review board approval, patients with PC who received adjuvant or salvage IMRT or PBT (70.2 gray with an endorectal balloon) after prostatectomy from 2009 through 2017 were reviewed. Factors including combined IMRT and PBT and/or concurrent malignancies prompted exclusion. A case-matched cohort analysis was performed using nearest-neighbor 3-to-1 matching by age and GU/GI disorder history. Logistic and Cox regressions were used to identify univariate and multivariate associations between toxicities and cohort/dosimetric characteristics. Toxicity-free survival (TFS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Three hundred seven men (mean ± SD age, 59.7 ± 6.3 years; IMRT, n = 237; PBT, n = 70) were identified, generating 70 matched pairs. The median follow-up was 48.6 and 46.1 months for the IMRT and PBT groups, respectively. Although PBT was superior at reducing low-range (volumes receiving 10% to 40% of the dose, respectively) bladder and rectal doses (all P ≤ .01), treatment modality was not associated with differences in clinician-reported acute or late GU/GI toxicities (all P ≥ .05). Five-year grade ≥2 GU and grade ≥1 GI TFS was 61.1% and 73.7% for IMRT, respectively, and 70.7% and 75.3% for PBT, respectively; and 5-year grade ≥3 GU and GI TFS was >95% for both groups (all P ≥ .05).
Postprostatectomy PBT minimized low-range bladder and rectal doses relative to IMRT; however, treatment modality was not associated with clinician-reported GU/GI toxicities. Future prospective investigation and ongoing follow-up will determine whether dosimetric differences between IMRT and PBT confer clinically meaningful differences in long-term outcomes.
尽管质子束治疗(PBT)在前列腺癌根治术后的应用越来越多,但与调强放疗(IMRT)相比,关于其毒性结果的数据尚不存在。作者比较了前列腺癌患者接受前列腺癌根治术后 IMRT 与 PBT 治疗的急性和晚期泌尿生殖系统(GU)和胃肠道(GI)毒性结果。
经机构审查委员会批准,回顾了 2009 年至 2017 年间接受前列腺癌根治术后辅助或挽救性 IMRT 或 PBT(70.2 格雷,使用直肠内球囊)治疗的患者。排除了综合 IMRT 和 PBT 以及/或同时发生的恶性肿瘤的因素。通过年龄和 GU/GI 障碍史的最近邻 3:1 匹配进行病例匹配队列分析。使用逻辑和 Cox 回归分析来确定毒性与队列/剂量学特征之间的单变量和多变量关联。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法评估毒性无进展生存率(TFS)。
共确定了 307 名男性(平均年龄±标准差,59.7±6.3 岁;IMRT 组 n=237;PBT 组 n=70),产生了 70 对匹配。IMRT 和 PBT 组的中位随访时间分别为 48.6 个月和 46.1 个月。尽管 PBT 在降低低剂量范围(分别接受 10%至 40%剂量的体积)的膀胱和直肠剂量方面更有优势(均 P≤.01),但治疗方式与临床医生报告的急性或晚期 GU/GI 毒性之间没有差异(均 P≥.05)。IMRT 组 5 年 GU 分级≥2 和 GI 分级≥1 的 TFS 分别为 61.1%和 73.7%,PBT 组分别为 70.7%和 75.3%;两组 5 年 GU 和 GI 分级≥3 的 TFS 均>95%(均 P≥.05)。
前列腺癌根治术后 PBT 与 IMRT 相比可最小化低剂量范围的膀胱和直肠剂量;然而,治疗方式与临床医生报告的 GU/GI 毒性无关。未来的前瞻性研究和持续随访将确定 IMRT 和 PBT 之间的剂量学差异是否会在长期结果中产生有临床意义的差异。