Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Jul 15;110(4):1082-1089. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.043. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
Data comparing moderately hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT) are lacking. We aim to compare late toxicity profiles of patients with early-stage prostate cancer treated with moderately hypofractionated PBT and IMRT.
This multi-institutional analysis included patients with low- or intermediate-risk biopsy-proven prostate adenocarcinoma from 7 tertiary referral centers treated from 1998 to 2018. All patients were treated with moderately hypofractionated radiation, defined as 250 to 300 cGy per daily fraction given for 4 to 6 weeks, and stratified by use of IMRT or PBT. Primary outcomes were late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Adjusted toxicity rates were calculated using inverse probability of treatment weighting, accounting for race, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group, age, pretreatment International Prostate Symptom Score (GU only), and anticoagulant use (GI only).
A total of 1850 patients were included: 1282 IMRT (median follow-up 80.0 months) and 568 PBT (median follow-up 43.9 months). Overall toxicity rates were low, with the majority of patients experiencing no late GU (56.6%, n = 1048) or late GI (74.4%, n = 1377) toxicity. No difference was seen in the rates of late toxicity between the groups, with late grade 3+ GU toxicity of 2.0% versus 3.9% (odds ratio [OR] 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.17-1.28) and late grade 2+ GI toxicity of 14.6% versus 4.7% (OR 2.69; confidence interval 0.80-9.05) for the PBT and IMRT cohorts, respectively. On multivariable analysis, no factors were significantly predictive of GU toxicity, and only anticoagulant use was significantly predictive of GI toxicity (OR 1.90; P = .008).
In this large, multi-institutional analysis of 1850 patients with early-stage prostate cancer, treatment with moderately hypofractionated IMRT and PBT resulted in low rates of toxicity. No difference was seen in late GI and GU toxicity between the modalities during long-term follow-up. Both treatments are safe and well tolerated.
缺乏中分割强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)和质子束治疗(PBT)的比较数据。我们旨在比较采用中分割 PBT 和 IMRT 治疗的早期前列腺癌患者的晚期毒性特征。
这项多机构分析包括来自 7 个三级转诊中心的低危或中危经活检证实的前列腺腺癌患者,他们于 1998 年至 2018 年期间接受治疗。所有患者均接受中分割放疗,定义为每天 250 至 300cGy 的分割剂量,4 至 6 周完成治疗,并按 IMRT 或 PBT 进行分层。主要结局为晚期泌尿生殖系统(GU)和胃肠道(GI)毒性。使用逆概率治疗加权法计算调整后的毒性发生率,考虑种族、国家综合癌症网络风险组、年龄、治疗前国际前列腺症状评分(仅 GU)和抗凝剂使用(仅 GI)。
共纳入 1850 例患者:1282 例 IMRT(中位随访 80.0 个月)和 568 例 PBT(中位随访 43.9 个月)。总体毒性发生率较低,大多数患者无晚期 GU(56.6%,n=1048)或晚期 GI(74.4%,n=1377)毒性。两组间晚期毒性发生率无差异,PBT 组晚期 3+GU 毒性发生率为 2.0%,IMRT 组为 3.9%(比值比[OR]0.47;95%置信区间 0.17-1.28),PBT 组晚期 2+GI 毒性发生率为 14.6%,IMRT 组为 4.7%(OR 2.69;95%置信区间 0.80-9.05)。多变量分析显示,无任何因素对 GU 毒性有显著预测作用,只有抗凝剂使用对 GI 毒性有显著预测作用(OR 1.90;P=0.008)。
在这项对 1850 例早期前列腺癌患者的大型多机构分析中,采用中分割 IMRT 和 PBT 治疗的毒性发生率较低。在长期随访中,两种治疗方式的晚期 GI 和 GU 毒性无差异。两种治疗方法均安全且耐受良好。