Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Department of Child Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Adv Nutr. 2020 Mar 1;11(2):237-250. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz085.
Insufficient intake of total fruits and vegetables is linked to an increased cancer risk, but the relation is not understood for dried fruits. Dried fruits are generally perceived, by both consumers and researchers, as a less attractive but shelf-stable equivalent to fresh fruits and constitute a small but significant proportion of modern diets. Chemical compositions of raw and dried fruits, however, may differ substantially. Several clinical and laboratory intervention studies have reported the protective effects of dehydrated fruits against the progression of some cancers and the modulating effects of dried fruits on common cancer risk factors. In this systematic review, we identified, summarized, and critically evaluated 9 prospective cohort and 7 case-control studies that examined the relations between traditional dried fruit (raisins, prunes, dates) consumption and cancer risk in humans. Prospective cohort studies determined that significant reductions in relative risk of precancerous colorectal polyps, incidence of prostate cancer, or mortality from pancreatic cancer, by, respectively, 24%, 49%, and 65%, were associated with 3-5 or more servings of dried fruits per week. Selected case-control studies revealed inverse associations between dried fruit intake and risk of cancer as well. The reported associations were comparable to or stronger than those observed for total or raw fruits. Although the small number and high heterogeneity impede meta-analysis of these studies, we conclude that currently available data provide some initial evidence that consumption of dried fruits may be associated with a lower cancer incidence or mortality in populations. The data suggest that higher intake of raisins and other dried fruits may be important in the prevention of cancers of the digestive system. Because only a limited number of health outcome and dried fruit intake relations have been evaluated in prospective studies to date, reanalyzing existing high-quality epidemiological data may expand the knowledge base.
摄入总水果和蔬菜不足与癌症风险增加有关,但对于干水果,其关系尚不清楚。干水果通常被消费者和研究人员视为新鲜水果的吸引力较小但货架稳定的替代品,并且构成现代饮食的一小部分,但意义重大。然而,生水果和干水果的化学成分可能有很大的不同。一些临床和实验室干预研究报告了脱水水果对某些癌症进展的保护作用,以及干水果对常见癌症危险因素的调节作用。在这项系统评价中,我们确定、总结和批判性评估了 9 项前瞻性队列研究和 7 项病例对照研究,这些研究检查了传统干水果(葡萄干、李子干、枣)消费与人类癌症风险之间的关系。前瞻性队列研究表明,每周食用 3-5 份或更多份干水果,分别使结直肠息肉前病变、前列腺癌发病率或胰腺癌死亡率的相对风险显著降低 24%、49%和 65%。一些选定的病例对照研究也揭示了干水果摄入量与癌症风险之间的反比关系。报告的相关性与总水果或生水果的相关性相当或更强。尽管这些研究的数量少且高度异质性,妨碍了荟萃分析,但我们得出的结论是,目前可用的数据提供了一些初步证据,表明食用干水果可能与人群中较低的癌症发病率或死亡率相关。这些数据表明,摄入更多的葡萄干和其他干水果可能对预防消化系统癌症很重要。由于迄今为止只有有限数量的健康结果和干水果摄入量关系在前瞻性研究中进行了评估,重新分析现有的高质量流行病学数据可能会扩展知识库。