Suppr超能文献

选择、期望与睡眠困难的安慰剂效应。

Choice, Expectations, and the Placebo Effect for Sleep Difficulty.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.

出版信息

Ann Behav Med. 2020 Jan 24;54(2):94-107. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz030.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Choice has been found to facilitate placebo effects for single-session treatments where standard placebo treatment without choice failed to elicit a placebo effect. However, it is unknown whether choice can enhance the placebo effect for treatments occurring over a period of days and where placebo effects are readily established without choice.

PURPOSE

We tested whether single or daily choice between two (placebo) treatments enhanced the placebo effect for sleep difficulty relative to no choice and no treatment over a 1 week period.

METHODS

One-hundred and seventeen volunteers self-identifying with sleep difficulty were recruited under the guise of a hypnotic trial and randomized to one of the four groups. Self-reported outcomes included insomnia severity, fatigue, total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), perceived sleep quality (PSQ), and treatment satisfaction. Objective TST and SOL were assessed in a subsample via actigraphy.

RESULTS

Overall, placebo treatment significantly improved insomnia severity, fatigue, and PSQ, confirming a placebo effect on these outcomes. However, both traditional and Bayesian analysis indicated no benefit of choice on the placebo effect on any sleep outcome. Mediation analysis of the overall placebo effect indicated that expectancy completely mediated the placebo effects for insomnia severity and PSQ and partially mediated the placebo effect for fatigue.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that choice does not enhance the placebo effect over longer treatment periods (up to 7 days) when placebo effects are readily established without choice. As such, any benefit of choice on placebo effects may be confined to quite specific circumstances.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ACTRN12618001199202.

摘要

背景

在单次疗程中,选择被发现可以促进安慰剂效应,而在没有选择的标准安慰剂治疗未能产生安慰剂效应的情况下。然而,目前尚不清楚选择是否可以增强在数天内进行的治疗的安慰剂效应,并且在没有选择的情况下安慰剂效应很容易建立。

目的

我们测试了在一周的时间内,相对于没有选择和没有治疗,单次或每日在两种(安慰剂)治疗之间进行选择是否可以增强与睡眠困难相关的安慰剂效应。

方法

117 名自我报告有睡眠困难的志愿者以催眠试验的幌子招募,并随机分配到四个组之一。自我报告的结果包括失眠严重程度、疲劳、总睡眠时间(TST)、入睡潜伏期(SOL)、感知睡眠质量(PSQ)和治疗满意度。通过活动记录仪评估了客观的 TST 和 SOL。

结果

总的来说,安慰剂治疗显著改善了失眠严重程度、疲劳和 PSQ,证实了这些结果的安慰剂效应。然而,传统和贝叶斯分析都表明,选择对任何睡眠结果的安慰剂效应都没有好处。整体安慰剂效应的中介分析表明,期望完全中介了失眠严重程度和 PSQ 的安慰剂效应,并部分中介了疲劳的安慰剂效应。

结论

这些发现表明,当安慰剂效应在没有选择的情况下很容易建立时,选择不会增强更长治疗时间(长达 7 天)的安慰剂效应。因此,选择对安慰剂效应的任何好处可能仅限于非常特定的情况。

临床试验注册

ACTRN12618001199202。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验