Monteiro Tiago, Alfonso José F, Franqueira Nuno, Faria-Correira Fernando, Ambrósio Renato, Madrid-Costa David
Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.
Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;30(6):1246-1255. doi: 10.1177/1120672119872367. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
The purpose was to compare the visual, refractive and aberrometric results of intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation with manual dissection and femtosecond laser-assisted surgery.
This is a multicentre study, which included consecutive patients with paracentral keratoconus, in which the difference between the axes of the topographic flattest and the coma aberration was <60°, who had Ferrara-type intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation using manual dissection or femtosecond laser technique. LogMAR uncorrected (uncorrected distance visual acuity) and corrected (corrected distance visual acuity) distance visual acuity, refractive errors and the root mean square for corneal coma-like aberration were recorded before and at 6 months after surgery.
The study included 84 and 110 eyes in the manual group and in the femtosecond group, respectively. After surgery, there was a statistically significant improvement in uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity for both groups ( < 0.0001), and there were no statistically significant differences between groups ( > 0.3). For both groups, there was a reduction in spherical equivalent after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation ( < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in the magnitude of spherical equivalent reduction ( = 0.34) The magnitude of the root mean square coma-like reduction was 0.93 ± 0.76 and 0.83 ± 0.80 μm in the manual and femtosecond group, respectively ( = 0.2). While in the femtosecond laser group no complications were reported, in the manual group, the intraoperative or postoperative complications rate was 13.09%.
Although both surgical techniques provide comparable visual, refractive and aberrometric outcomes, it should be noted that the femtosecond laser is a safer surgical procedure, with no complications reported.
比较手动剖切和飞秒激光辅助手术行基质内角膜环片植入术的视觉、屈光和像差结果。
这是一项多中心研究,纳入连续的周边圆锥角膜患者,其地形图最平坦轴与彗差轴之间的差异<60°,采用手动剖切或飞秒激光技术行费拉拉型基质内角膜环片植入术。记录手术前及术后6个月的LogMAR未矫正(未矫正远视力)和矫正(矫正远视力)远视力、屈光不正以及角膜类彗差的均方根。
手动组和飞秒组分别纳入84只眼和110只眼。手术后,两组的未矫正远视力和矫正远视力均有统计学显著改善(<0.0001),组间无统计学显著差异(>0.3)。两组基质内角膜环片植入后等效球镜度均降低(<0.0001)。等效球镜度降低幅度组间无统计学显著差异(=0.34)。手动组和飞秒组类彗差均方根降低幅度分别为0.93±0.76和0.83±0.80μm(=0.2)。飞秒激光组未报告并发症,而手动组术中或术后并发症发生率为13.09%。
虽然两种手术技术在视觉、屈光和像差结果方面相当,但应注意飞秒激光手术更安全,未报告并发症。