Monteiro Tiago, Alfonso José F, Franqueira Nuno, Faria-Correia Fernando, Ambrósio Renato, Madrid-Costa David
J Refract Surg. 2018 Mar 1;34(3):188-194. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180108-01.
To compare the predictability of intrastromal tunnel depth creation for intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation between manual dissection and femtosecond laser using a high-resolution anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).
This multicenter study included patients with keratoconus who had Ferrara-type ICRS implantation at Hospital de Braga using manual dissection and at the Fernandez-Vega Ophthalmological Institute using the femtosecond laser technique. The intended depth of implantation was compared to the achieved postoperative ICRS depth of each case, measured using a swept-source AS-OCT (CASIA SS-1000; Tomey Corporation, Nagoya, Japan) at three points (proximal, central, and distal end of the implant).
The study included 105 eyes in the manual group and 53 eyes in the femtosecond laser group. The differences of the intended versus the achieved depth were statistically higher in the manual group for all positions measured (Wilcoxon ranked-sum, P < .001). In the manual group, there were significant differences between the mean values of intended and achieved depth after surgery for the three locations measured (Wilcoxon signed-rank, P < .05), whereas there were no significant differences in the femtosecond laser group. In the manual group, the proximal part of the stromal tunnel was significantly shallower (-40.87 ± 69.03 μm) than the central (-25.54 ± 71.00 μm) and distal (-26.52 ± 73.22 μm) parts (Friedman test, P < .05).
ICRS implantation assisted by a femtosecond laser provides a more precise procedure considering dissection depth when compared with the manual dissection technique. Such an advantage may provide more predictable clinical results and safer procedures with the femtosecond laser. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(3):188-194.].
使用高分辨率眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)比较手动剖切和飞秒激光在基质内角膜环片(ICRS)植入术中创建基质内隧道深度的可预测性。
这项多中心研究纳入了圆锥角膜患者,其中在布拉加医院使用手动剖切植入费拉拉型ICRS,在费尔南德斯-维加眼科研究所使用飞秒激光技术。将预期植入深度与术后通过扫频源AS-OCT(CASIA SS-1000;日本名古屋多美公司)在植入物的三个点(近端、中央和远端)测量的每个病例的实际ICRS深度进行比较。
手动组纳入105只眼,飞秒激光组纳入53只眼。在手动组中,所有测量位置的预期深度与实际深度的差异在统计学上更高(Wilcoxon秩和检验,P < 0.001)。在手动组中,术后三个测量位置的预期深度与实际深度的平均值之间存在显著差异(Wilcoxon符号秩检验,P < 0.05),而飞秒激光组则无显著差异。在手动组中,基质隧道的近端部分(-40.87±69.03μm)明显比中央部分(-25.54±71.00μm)和远端部分(-26.52±73.22μm)浅(Friedman检验,P < 0.05)。
与手动剖切技术相比,飞秒激光辅助的ICRS植入术在剖切深度方面提供了更精确的操作。这种优势可能使飞秒激光手术获得更可预测的临床结果和更安全的手术过程。[《屈光手术杂志》。2018;34(3):188 - 194。]