Schulze-Bonhage Andreas, Hamer Hajo, Krämer Günter
Epilepsiezentrum, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 64, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Nervenarzt. 2020 Feb;91(2):114-121. doi: 10.1007/s00115-019-00800-3.
In the new classification of epileptic seizures by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), a multitude of changes are recommended particularly for seizures of focal origin. In addition to aspects of the nomenclature, this involves the introduction of different levels of classification with respect to the state of consciousness and the evolution to a bilateral tonic-clonic seizure, the inclusion of the first semiological seizure element in the classification and a new operationalization of the state of consciousness. This leads partly to specification in the description but in some areas also to counterintuitive changes in the classification. The advantages and disadvantages of this reorganization for the clinical practice are critically discussed with reference to the most important modifications.
在国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)的癫痫发作新分类中,针对局灶性起源的发作提出了诸多改变建议。除了术语方面,这还涉及引入关于意识状态以及演变为双侧强直阵挛发作的不同分类层次,在分类中纳入首个症状学发作要素以及意识状态的新操作化定义。这在一定程度上导致描述更加具体,但在某些方面也使分类出现了与直觉相悖的变化。本文参照最重要的修改内容,对这种重组在临床实践中的优缺点进行了批判性讨论。