WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (Austrian Public Health Institute), Stubenring 6, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Health Division, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 75116, Paris, France.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Dec;17(6):803-816. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00509-z.
The study aimed to analyse the financial burden that co-payments for prescribed and reimbursed medicines pose on patients in European countries.
Five medicines used in acute conditions (antibiotic, analgesic) and in chronic care (hypertension, asthma, diabetes) were selected. Co-payments (standard and five defined population groups, e.g. low-income people, patients with high consumption) were surveyed based on information retrieved from national price lists (September 2017) and co-payment regulation in nine countries (Albania, Austria, England, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Kyrgyzstan and Sweden). The financial burden of the selected medicines (originator and lowest-priced generic) was described as the percentage of patients' payments for 1 month's therapy or treatment of one episode in comparison to the national minimum monthly wage.
The study showed large variation in co-payments between the countries. Financial burden resulting from co-payments for reimbursed medicines tended to be higher in lower-income countries (Kyrgyzstan: 9% of minimum monthly wage for generic amlodipine; 2-4% for generic and originator salbutamol; Albania: approximately 3% for originator amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and metformin). Most studied countries applied reduction or exemption mechanisms (children were exempt in five countries, no or lower co-payments for low-income people in five countries, exemptions from co-payments upon reaching a threshold of expenses in six countries).
Co-payments for prescribed medicines can pose a substantial financial burden for outpatients, particularly in lower-income countries. The price of a medicine, availability of lower-priced medicines and the design of co-payments, including exemptions and reductions for specific groups, can considerably impact patients' expenses for medicines.
本研究旨在分析欧洲国家患者自付处方药和报销药品费用的经济负担。
选择五种在急性病(抗生素、镇痛药)和慢性病(高血压、哮喘、糖尿病)中使用的药物。根据从九个国家(阿尔巴尼亚、奥地利、英国、法国、德国、希腊、匈牙利、吉尔吉斯斯坦和瑞典)的国家价格清单(2017 年 9 月)和自付额规定中检索到的信息,调查了自付额(标准和五个特定人群组,如低收入人群、高消费患者)。所选择药品(原研药和最便宜的仿制药)的经济负担描述为每个月疗程或单次治疗的患者支付费用占国家最低工资的百分比。
研究表明各国之间的自付额差异很大。在低收入国家,报销药品的自付费用负担往往更高(吉尔吉斯斯坦:最便宜的氨氯地平仿制药自付额占最低工资的 9%;最便宜的沙丁胺醇和原研药自付额占 2-4%;阿尔巴尼亚:阿莫西林/克拉维酸和二甲双胍原研药的自付额约占 3%)。大多数研究国家都采用了减免或豁免机制(五个国家的儿童免除自付额,五个国家的低收入人群不收取或收取较低的自付额,六个国家的自付额在达到费用门槛时可豁免)。
患者自付处方药费用可能对门诊患者造成重大经济负担,特别是在低收入国家。药品价格、较便宜药品的可及性以及自付额的设计,包括针对特定群体的豁免和减免,都会对患者的药品费用产生重大影响。