• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

16 个欧洲和拉丁美洲国家癌症药物的价格和可负担性比较。

Comparison of Prices and Affordability of Cancer Medicines in 16 Countries in Europe and Latin America.

机构信息

Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.

WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG/Austrian National Public Health Institute), Stubenring 6, 1010, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Jan;20(1):67-77. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00670-4. Epub 2021 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-021-00670-4
PMID:34228312
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8752537/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are concerns that high prices of cancer medicines may limit patient access. Since information on prices for cancer medicines and their impact on affordability is lacking for several countries, particularly for lower income countries, this study surveys prices of originator cancer medicines in Europe and Latin America and assesses their affordability.

METHODS

For 19 cancer medicines, public procurement and ex-factory prices, as of 2017, were surveyed in five Latin American (LATAM) countries (Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru) and 11 European countries (Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UK). Price data (public procurement prices in LATAM and ex-factory prices in Europe) in US dollar purchasing power parities (PPP) were analyzed per defined daily dose. Affordability was measured by setting medicines prices in relation to national minimum wages.

RESULTS

The prices of cancer medicines varied considerably between countries. In European countries with higher levels of income, PPP-adjusted prices tended to be lower than in European countries of lower income and LATAM countries. Except for one medicine, all surveyed medicines were considered unaffordable in most countries. In European countries of lower income and LATAM countries, more than 15 days' worth of minimum wages would be required by a worker to purchase one defined daily dose of several of the studied medicines.

CONCLUSIONS

The high prices and large unaffordability of cancer medicines call for strengthening pricing policies with the aim of ensuring affordable treatment in cancer care.

摘要

背景

人们担心癌症药物的高价可能会限制患者的可及性。由于几个国家,尤其是低收入国家,缺乏有关癌症药物价格及其对可负担性影响的信息,因此本研究调查了欧洲和拉丁美洲(LATAM)地区原产癌症药物的价格,并评估了其可负担性。

方法

对于 19 种癌症药物,本研究调查了截至 2017 年在五个拉丁美洲国家(巴西、智利、哥伦比亚、墨西哥和秘鲁)和 11 个欧洲国家(奥地利、法国、德国、希腊、匈牙利、荷兰、波兰、罗马尼亚、西班牙、瑞典和英国)的公共采购和出厂价格。按每定义日剂量分析以美元购买力平价(PPP)表示的价格数据(LATAM 的公共采购价格和欧洲的出厂价格)。通过将药物价格与国家最低工资挂钩来衡量可负担性。

结果

癌症药物的价格在国家之间存在很大差异。在收入水平较高的欧洲国家,PPP 调整后的价格往往低于收入较低的欧洲国家和 LATAM 国家。除一种药物外,在大多数国家,所有调查的药物都被认为是无法负担的。在收入较低的欧洲国家和 LATAM 国家,工人需要花费超过 15 天的最低工资才能购买几种研究药物的一个定义日剂量。

结论

癌症药物的高价格和大量的不可负担性呼吁加强定价政策,以确保癌症治疗的可负担性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e33a/8752537/0dc84f2a21b8/40258_2021_670_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e33a/8752537/5d9ec39d713b/40258_2021_670_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e33a/8752537/0dc84f2a21b8/40258_2021_670_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e33a/8752537/5d9ec39d713b/40258_2021_670_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e33a/8752537/0dc84f2a21b8/40258_2021_670_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Prices and Affordability of Cancer Medicines in 16 Countries in Europe and Latin America.16 个欧洲和拉丁美洲国家癌症药物的价格和可负担性比较。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Jan;20(1):67-77. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00670-4. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
2
Availability, prices, and affordability of selected essential cancer medicines in a middle-income country - the case of Mexico.中低收入国家特定基本抗癌药物的可及性、价格和可负担性——以墨西哥为例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 14;20(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05167-9.
3
Price comparison of high-cost originator medicines in European countries.欧洲国家高成本原研药的价格比较。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Apr;17(2):221-230. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1223543. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
4
Prices, Costs, and Affordability of New Medicines for Hepatitis C in 30 Countries: An Economic Analysis.30个国家丙型肝炎新药的价格、成本及可负担性:一项经济分析
PLoS Med. 2016 May 31;13(5):e1002032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002032. eCollection 2016 May.
5
Evaluating essential medicines for treating childhood cancers: availability, price and affordability study in Ghana.评估治疗儿童癌症的基本药物:加纳的可得性、价格和可负担性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08435-x.
6
Country and regional variations in purchase prices for essential cancer medications.基本癌症药物采购价格的国家和地区差异。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 24;17(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3553-5.
7
Evaluation of prices, availability and affordability of essential medicines in Lahore Division, Pakistan: A cross-sectional survey using WHO/HAI methodology.巴基斯坦拉合尔分部基本药物的价格、可及性和可负担性评估:使用世卫组织/卫生技术评估机构方法的横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 25;14(4):e0216122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216122. eCollection 2019.
8
Baseline assessment of WHO's target for both availability and affordability of essential medicines to treat non-communicable diseases.对世界卫生组织关于治疗非传染性疾病基本药物的可及性和可负担性目标的基线评估。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 7;12(2):e0171284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171284. eCollection 2017.
9
Relationship between pharmaceutical pricing strategies with price, availability, and affordability of cardiovascular disease medicines: surveys in Qatar and Lebanon.心血管病药物的定价策略与价格、可及性和可负担性之间的关系:在卡塔尔和黎巴嫩的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 18;19(1):973. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4828-0.
10
Affordability of medicines in the European Union.欧盟药品的可负担性。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 27;12(2):e0172753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172753. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision Medicine for Cancer and Health Equity in Latin America: Generating Understanding for Policy and Health System Shaping.拉丁美洲癌症精准医学与健康公平:增进对政策制定和卫生系统塑造的理解
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 5;22(8):1220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081220.
2
Investigating Drug Treatment Costs and Patient Characteristics of Female Breast, Cervical, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancers in Antigua and Barbuda: A Retrospective Data Study (2017-2021).安提瓜和巴布达女性乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌和前列腺癌的药物治疗成本及患者特征调查:一项回顾性数据研究(2017 - 2021年)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 12;22(6):930. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060930.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Availability, prices, and affordability of selected essential cancer medicines in a middle-income country - the case of Mexico.中低收入国家特定基本抗癌药物的可及性、价格和可负担性——以墨西哥为例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 14;20(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05167-9.
2
Prices and clinical benefit of cancer drugs in the USA and Europe: a cost-benefit analysis.美国和欧洲的癌症药物价格和临床获益:成本效益分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):664-670. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30139-X.
3
Pharmaceutical Products and Their Value: Lessons Learned and the Path Ahead.
Replenish Revenue by Low-Cost Medicines, an Institution-Specific Action to Improve Access to High-Cost Medicines Used for Chronic Illness in Ethiopia: Narrative Review.
通过低成本药品补充收入:埃塞俄比亚改善慢性病高成本药品可及性的机构特定行动叙事综述
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;8(5):e70775. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70775. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Changes in essential cancer medicines and association with cancer outcomes: an observational study of 158 countries.基本癌症药物的变化及其与癌症结局的关联:一项对158个国家的观察性研究
BMC Cancer. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1526. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13247-w.
5
Caregiver Burden of Palliative Cancer Patients: A Cross-Cultural Perspective.姑息治疗癌症患者的照顾者负担:跨文化视角
Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2024 Feb 28;32(1):110-115. doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2024.23058.
6
Factors impacting hospitalisation and related health service costs in cancer survivors in Australia: Results from a population data linkage study in Queensland (COS-Q).澳大利亚癌症幸存者住院和相关医疗服务费用的影响因素:昆士兰州人群数据链接研究的结果(COS-Q)。
Cancer Med. 2024 Sep;13(17):e70201. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70201.
7
Market Transparency in Medicine Pricing: Pathways to Fair Pricing.药品定价中的市场透明度:实现公平定价的途径
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(6):611-614. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01390-y. Epub 2024 May 9.
8
Developing Nepal's medicines pricing policy: evidence synthesis and stakeholders' consultation.制定尼泊尔药品定价政策:证据综合与利益相关者协商
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Apr 29;17(1):2346222. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2346222. eCollection 2024.
9
Cost-effectiveness of the top 100 drugs by public spending in Canada, 2015-2021: a repeated cross-sectional study.加拿大 2015-2021 年公共支出排名前 100 位药物的成本效益:一项重复横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 13;14(3):e082568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082568.
10
A Cross-National Comparison of Biosimilars Pricing in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy.阿根廷、澳大利亚、巴西和意大利的生物类似药定价的跨国比较。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 May;58(3):549-556. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00623-8. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
药品及其价值:经验教训与未来之路。
Value Health. 2020 Apr;23(4):421-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
4
The Impact of Price Negotiations on Public Procurement Prices and Access to 8 Innovative Cancer Medicines in a Middle-Income Country: The Case of Mexico.价格谈判对中等收入国家公共采购价格及8种创新癌症药物可及性的影响:以墨西哥为例
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 Dec;20:129-135. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
5
Access to innovative cancer medicines in a middle-income country - the case of Mexico.中等收入国家获取创新癌症药物——以墨西哥为例。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2018 Oct 24;11:25. doi: 10.1186/s40545-018-0153-y. eCollection 2018.
6
Effectiveness of National Pricing Policies for Patent-Protected Pharmaceuticals in the OECD: A Systematic Literature Review.OECD 国家专利药品定价政策的有效性:系统文献综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Apr;17(2):143-162. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0437-z.
7
Time to Entry for New Cancer Medicines: From European Union-Wide Marketing Authorization to Patient Access in Belgium, Estonia, Scotland, and Sweden.新癌症药物的准入时间:从欧盟范围内的营销授权到比利时、爱沙尼亚、苏格兰和瑞典的患者可及性。
Value Health. 2018 Jul;21(7):809-821. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
8
Higher pharmaceutical public expenditure after direct price control: improved access or induced demand? The Colombian case.直接价格管制后更高的药品公共支出:是改善了可及性还是引发了需求?哥伦比亚的案例
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Mar 2;16:8. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0092-0. eCollection 2018.
9
Pharmaceutical Regulation in Central and Eastern European Countries: A Current Review.中东欧国家的药品监管:当前综述
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Dec 18;8:892. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00892. eCollection 2017.
10
Availability of anticancer medicines in public and private sectors, and their affordability by low, middle and high-income class patients in Pakistan.在巴基斯坦,公共和私营部门抗癌药物的供应情况,以及低收入、中等收入和高收入阶层患者的负担能力。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 3;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3980-3.