Department of Anaesthesia, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75(1):72-79. doi: 10.1111/anae.14846. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
Technology that facilitates performance of deep peripheral nerve blocks is of clinical interest. The Onvision™ is a new device for ultrasonographic needle tip tracking that incorporates an ultrasound sensor on the needle tip that is then represented by a green circle on the ultrasound screen. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of needle tip tracking on procedural time in the first human volunteer study. Secondary outcome measures included: number of hand movements; hand movement path length; block success rate; block onset time; block duration; discomfort experienced by the volunteers; and the anaesthetists' confidence as to whether their block would be successful. Two anaesthetists performed ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus blocks with an out-of-plane technique, with and without the use of needle tip tracking. In total, data from 25 volunteers were studied. Mean (SD) procedural time was 163 (103) s with needle tip tracking and 216 (117) s without (p = 0.10). Hand motion analysis showed that needle tip tracking was associated with a significant decrease in the mean (SD) number of intended needling hand movements (39 (29) vs. 59 (36); p = 0.03) and path lengths (3.2 (3.1) m vs. 5.5 (4.5) m; p = 0.03). No differences were found for any other secondary outcomes. The use of Onvision needle tip tracking did not reduce procedural time for out-of-plane ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block but did reduce the number of hand movements and path lengths. This may indicate improved needle control but further studies are needed to confirm this finding.
有助于实施深部周围神经阻滞的技术具有临床意义。Onvision™ 是一种新的超声针尖跟踪设备,它在针尖上集成了一个超声传感器,然后在超声屏幕上用一个绿色圆圈表示。本研究的主要目的是在首例人体志愿者研究中调查针尖跟踪对程序时间的影响。次要结果包括:针尖跟踪对程序时间的影响;手的运动次数;手运动路径长度;阻滞成功率;阻滞起效时间;阻滞持续时间;志愿者的不适感;以及麻醉师对其阻滞是否成功的信心。两名麻醉师使用平面外技术进行超声引导的腰丛阻滞,分别使用和不使用针尖跟踪。总共研究了 25 名志愿者的数据。使用针尖跟踪时的平均(标准差)程序时间为 163(103)s,不使用针尖跟踪时为 216(117)s(p=0.10)。手部运动分析表明,针尖跟踪与平均(标准差)计划针刺手的运动次数(39(29)比 59(36);p=0.03)和路径长度(3.2(3.1)m 比 5.5(4.5)m;p=0.03)显著减少有关。其他次要结果无差异。在平面外超声引导腰丛阻滞中,使用 Onvision 针尖跟踪并未减少手术时间,但减少了手的运动次数和路径长度。这可能表明针尖控制得到了改善,但需要进一步的研究来证实这一发现。