• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术霸凌不留痕迹。

Academic bullies leave no trace.

作者信息

Mahmoudi Morteza

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

Bioimpacts. 2019;9(3):129-130. doi: 10.15171/bi.2019.17. Epub 2019 May 26.

DOI:10.15171/bi.2019.17
PMID:31508328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6726746/
Abstract

Bullying in academic science is a growing concern. It may vary in severity from insults, snubs, or invasions of privacy to violations of intellectual property and unfair crediting of authors. In extreme cases it may even include coercing lab workers to sign away rights to authorship or even intellectual property. Cumbersome institutional protocols and fears of reprisal may discourage targets of bullying from reporting such incidents; lab workers in the US on visas may feel especially vulnerable. Possible strategies to combat bullying include detailed examination of relevant documentation for signs of coercion or inaccuracy and specific training on reporting for those at risk of abuse.

摘要

学术科学界的欺凌现象日益受到关注。其严重程度各不相同,从侮辱、冷落、侵犯隐私到侵犯知识产权以及不公正地署名作者。在极端情况下,甚至可能包括强迫实验室工作人员放弃著作权乃至知识产权。繁琐的机构程序以及对报复的恐惧可能会阻碍欺凌行为的受害者举报此类事件;持签证在美国工作的实验室工作人员可能会觉得格外脆弱。应对欺凌的可能策略包括详细审查相关文件以查找胁迫或不准确的迹象,以及为有受虐风险的人员提供关于举报的专门培训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b6b/6726746/7d3254411f0c/bi-9-129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b6b/6726746/7d3254411f0c/bi-9-129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b6b/6726746/7d3254411f0c/bi-9-129-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Academic bullies leave no trace.学术霸凌不留痕迹。
Bioimpacts. 2019;9(3):129-130. doi: 10.15171/bi.2019.17. Epub 2019 May 26.
2
STEM the bullying: An empirical investigation of abusive supervision in academic science.制止霸凌行为:对学术科研领域中辱骂性监督的实证研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Sep 8;40:101121. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101121. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
The urgent need for modification of scientific ranking indexes to facilitate scientific progress and diminish academic bullying.迫切需要修改科学排名指标,以促进科学进步并减少学术霸凌。
Bioimpacts. 2020;10(1):5-7. doi: 10.15171/bi.2019.30. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
4
Bullying in Spanish secondary schools: gender-based differences.西班牙中学的欺凌行为:基于性别的差异。
Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E21. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.37.
5
Improve reporting systems for academic bullying.改进学术霸凌的报告系统。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):494. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07154-x.
6
The absence of legal remedies following academic bullying.学术霸凌后缺乏法律补救措施。
Bioimpacts. 2020;10(2):63-64. doi: 10.34172/bi.2020.08. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
7
The interpersonal worlds of bullies: parents, peers, and partners.霸凌者的人际世界:父母、同龄人及伴侣。
J Interpers Violence. 2014 May;29(7):1338-53. doi: 10.1177/0886260513506278. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
8
Moral Disengagement of Pure Bullies and Bully/Victims: Shared and Distinct Mechanisms.纯粹欺凌者和欺凌/受欺凌者的道德脱离:共同和独特的机制。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Sep;48(9):1835-1848. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01067-2. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
9
The New Academic Environment and Faculty Misconduct.新的学术环境与教师不当行为。
Acad Med. 2016 Feb;91(2):175-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000956.
10
School Bullies' Intention to Change Behavior Following Teacher Interventions: Effects of Empathy Arousal, Condemning of Bullying, and Blaming of the Perpetrator.教师干预后学校霸凌者改变行为的意图:共情唤起、谴责霸凌行为以及指责霸凌者的影响。
Prev Sci. 2016 Nov;17(8):1034-1043. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0712-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Academic bullying in science and medicine: the need for reform.科学与医学领域的学术霸凌:改革之必要。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023 Nov 20;8(1):102270. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102270. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Women Academics' Intersectional Experiences of Policy Ineffectiveness in the European Context.欧洲背景下女性学者在政策无效性方面的交叉经历。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:810569. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810569. eCollection 2022.
3
Honorary authorship in health sciences: a protocol for a systematic review of survey research.

本文引用的文献

1
Proprietary data formats block health research.专有数据格式阻碍了健康研究。
Nature. 2019 Jan;565(7740):429. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00231-9.
2
Improve reporting systems for academic bullying.改进学术霸凌的报告系统。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):494. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07154-x.
3
Research is set up for bullies to thrive.研究的设置让恃强凌弱者得以得逞。
健康科学领域的荣誉作者制:一项系统综述调查研究的方案
Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;11(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01928-1.
4
Transformative dynamism in pharmaceutical and biomedical research: Complexity of integration of innovative R & D hubs.制药与生物医学研究中的变革性活力:创新研发中心整合的复杂性
Bioimpacts. 2021;11(3):227-233. doi: 10.34172/bi.2021.29. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
5
Distinguishing online academic bullying: identifying new forms of harassment in a dissenting Emeritus Professor's case.区分在线学术霸凌:在一位持不同意见的名誉教授案例中识别新的骚扰形式。
Heliyon. 2021 Feb 24;7(2):e06326. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06326. eCollection 2021 Feb.
6
The urgent need for modification of scientific ranking indexes to facilitate scientific progress and diminish academic bullying.迫切需要修改科学排名指标,以促进科学进步并减少学术霸凌。
Bioimpacts. 2020;10(1):5-7. doi: 10.15171/bi.2019.30. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
7
Scarcity of lab positions in high-ranked institutions creates a breeding ground for bullies.
Bioimpacts. 2019;9(4):251. doi: 10.15171/bi.2019.31. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7720):529. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06040-w.
4
Top geneticist loses £3.5-million grant in first test of landmark bullying policy.顶尖遗传学家在具有里程碑意义的反霸凌政策首次测试中失去了350万英镑的资助。
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7719):420. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06009-9.