Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Schizophr Bull. 2019 Sep 11;45(5):960-965. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbz054.
Exposures constitute a dense network of the environment: exposome. Here, we argue for embracing the exposome paradigm to investigate the sum of nongenetic "risk" and show how predictive modeling approaches can be used to construct an exposome score (ES; an aggregated score of exposures) for schizophrenia. The training dataset consisted of patients with schizophrenia and controls, whereas the independent validation dataset consisted of patients, their unaffected siblings, and controls. Binary exposures were cannabis use, hearing impairment, winter birth, bullying, and emotional, physical, and sexual abuse along with physical and emotional neglect. We applied logistic regression (LR), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and Ridge penalized classification models to the training dataset. ESs, the sum of weighted exposures based on coefficients from each model, were calculated in the validation dataset. In addition, we estimated ES based on meta-analyses and a simple sum score of exposures. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic, and Nagelkerke's R2 were compared. The ESMeta-analyses performed the worst, whereas the sum score and the ESGNB were worse than the ESLR that performed similar to the ESLASSO and ESRIDGE. The ESLR distinguished patients from controls (odds ratio [OR] = 1.94, P < .001), patients from siblings (OR = 1.58, P < .001), and siblings from controls (OR = 1.21, P = .001). An increase in ESLR was associated with a gradient increase of schizophrenia risk. In reference to the remaining fractions, the ESLR at top 30%, 20%, and 10% of the control distribution yielded ORs of 3.72, 3.74, and 4.77, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that predictive modeling approaches can be harnessed to evaluate the exposome.
暴露组。在这里,我们主张接受暴露组学范式来研究非遗传“风险”的总和,并展示如何使用预测建模方法来构建精神分裂症的暴露组评分(ES;暴露的综合评分)。训练数据集由精神分裂症患者和对照组组成,而独立验证数据集由患者、未受影响的兄弟姐妹和对照组组成。二进制暴露包括大麻使用、听力损伤、冬季出生、欺凌以及情感、身体和性虐待以及身体和情感忽视。我们将逻辑回归(LR)、高斯朴素贝叶斯(GNB)、最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)以及 Ridge 惩罚分类模型应用于训练数据集。在验证数据集中,根据每个模型的系数计算 ESs(加权暴露的总和)。此外,我们还根据荟萃分析和暴露的简单总和评分来估计 ES。比较了准确性、敏感性、特异性、接收者操作特征曲线下面积和 Nagelkerke 的 R2。ESMeta-analyses 的表现最差,而总和评分和 ESGNB 的表现不如 ESLR,ESLR 的表现与 ESLASSO 和 ESRIDGE 相似。ESLR 区分了患者和对照组(优势比 [OR] = 1.94,P <.001)、患者和兄弟姐妹(OR = 1.58,P <.001)以及兄弟姐妹和对照组(OR = 1.21,P =.001)。ESLR 的增加与精神分裂症风险的梯度增加相关。在参考剩余分数时,ESLR 在对照组分布的前 30%、20%和 10%处的 OR 分别为 3.72、3.74 和 4.77。我们的研究结果表明,可以利用预测建模方法来评估暴露组。