Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Yeditepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Neurosurgery, Yeditepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Jan;74(1):e13414. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13414. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
Despite developments in the treatment of pain, the availability of new drugs or increased knowledge of pain management, postoperative pain control after different surgeries remains inadequate. We aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of tramadol versus tramadol with paracetamol after lumbar discectomy.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients undergoing lumbar discectomy were randomly assigned into two groups.
Patients in Group T (n = 30) received tramadol (1 mg/kg), and patients in Group TP (n = 30) received tramadol (1 mg/kg) with paracetamol (1 g) 30 minutes before the end of surgery and paracetamol was continued during the postoperative period at 6 hours intervals for the first 24 hours. Patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol was used during the postoperative period.
Duration, postoperative pain scores, Ramsay sedation scores, analgesic consumption, and side effects were recorded in all patients during the postoperative period. Continuous random variables were tested for normal distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, than Student's t-test was used for means comparisons between groups. For discrete random variables chi-square tests and McNemar test was used.
Demographic data, mean duration of anaesthesia and surgery were similar in both groups. Postoperative pain scores were significantly higher in Group T than Group TP at 5; 15; 20; and 30 minutes (P = .021, P = .004, P = .002, P = .018). Late postoperative pain scores were similar. Total tramadol consumption in Group T (106.12 ± 4.84 mg) was higher than Group TP (81.20 ± 2.53) during the 24 hours postoperative period. However, continuing the paracetamol at 6 hours interval did not change late postoperative pain scores.
The administration of tramadol with paracetamol was more effective than tramadol alone for early acute postoperative pain therapy following lumbar discectomy. Therefore, while adding paracetamol in early pain management is recommended, continuing paracetamol for the late postoperative period is not advised.
尽管在疼痛治疗方面取得了进展,出现了新的药物或对疼痛管理的认识提高,但不同手术后的术后疼痛控制仍然不足。我们旨在比较曲马多与曲马多联合扑热息痛在腰椎间盘切除术后的术后镇痛效果。
设计、地点、参与者:60 例接受腰椎间盘切除术的患者被随机分为两组。
T 组(n=30)患者接受曲马多(1mg/kg),TP 组(n=30)患者在手术结束前 30 分钟接受曲马多(1mg/kg)和扑热息痛(1g),并在术后 6 小时间隔内持续使用扑热息痛 24 小时。术后期间使用患者自控镇痛曲马多。
所有患者在术后期间记录持续时间、术后疼痛评分、Ramsay 镇静评分、镇痛药物消耗和副作用。使用 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验检验连续随机变量是否服从正态分布,然后使用学生 t 检验比较组间均值。对于离散随机变量,使用卡方检验和 McNemar 检验。
两组患者的人口统计学数据、麻醉和手术的平均持续时间相似。与 TP 组相比,T 组术后 5、15、20 和 30 分钟时的术后疼痛评分显著更高(P=0.021、P=0.004、P=0.002、P=0.018)。晚期术后疼痛评分相似。T 组(106.12±4.84mg)在术后 24 小时内的曲马多总消耗量高于 TP 组(81.20±2.53mg)。然而,每 6 小时间隔继续给予扑热息痛并不会改变晚期术后疼痛评分。
与单独使用曲马多相比,曲马多联合扑热息痛在腰椎间盘切除术后的早期急性术后疼痛治疗中更有效。因此,建议在早期疼痛管理中加入扑热息痛,但不建议在晚期术后期间继续使用扑热息痛。