Verchère Eric, Grenier Bruno, Mesli Abdelghani, Siao Daniel, Sesay Mussa, Maurette Pierre
Department of Anesthesiology 3, University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2002 Apr;14(2):96-101. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200204000-00002.
The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of three different postoperative treatments after supratentorial craniotomy. Sixty-four patients were allocated prospectively and randomly into three groups: paracetamol (the P group, n = 8), paracetamol and tramadol (the PT group, n = 29), and paracetamol and nalbuphine (the PN group, n = 27). General anesthesia was standardized with propofol and remifentanil using atracurium as the muscle relaxant. One hour before the end of surgery, all patients received 30 mg/kg propacetamol intravenously then 30 mg/kg every 6 hours. Patients in the PT group received 1.5 mg/kg tramadol 1 hour before the end of surgery. For patients in the PN group, 0.15 mg/kg nalbuphine was injected after discontinuation of remifentanil, because of its mu-antagonist effect. Postoperative pain was assessed in the fully awake patient after extubation (hour 0) and at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours using a visual analog scale (VAS). Additional tramadol (1.5 mg/kg) or 0.15 mg/kg nalbuphine was administered when the VAS score was > or = 30 mm. Analgesia was compared using the Mantha and Kaplan-Meier methods. Adverse effects of the drugs were also measured. The three groups were similar with respect to the total dose of remifentanil received (0.27 +/- 0.1 mircog/kg/min). In all patients, extubation was obtained within 6 +/- 3 minutes after remifentanil administration. Postoperative analgesia was ineffective in the P group; therefore, inclusions in this group were stopped after the eighth patient. Postoperative analgesia was effective in the two remaining groups because VAS scores were similar, except at hour 1, when nalbuphine was more effective (P = .001). Nevertheless, acquiring such a result demanded significantly more tramadol than nalbuphine (P < .05). More cases of nausea and vomiting were observed in the PT group but the difference was not significant (P < .06). In conclusion, pain after supratentorial neurosurgery must be taken into account, and paracetamol alone is insufficient in bringing relief to the patient. Addition of either tramadol or nalbuphine to paracetamol seems necessary to achieve adequate analgesia, with, nevertheless, a larger dose of tramadol to fulfill this objective.
本研究的目的是比较幕上开颅术后三种不同治疗方法的镇痛效果。64例患者被前瞻性随机分为三组:对乙酰氨基酚组(P组,n = 8)、对乙酰氨基酚与曲马多组(PT组,n = 29)和对乙酰氨基酚与纳布啡组(PN组,n = 27)。采用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼进行标准化全身麻醉,使用阿曲库铵作为肌肉松弛剂。手术结束前1小时,所有患者静脉注射30mg/kg对乙酰氨基酚,然后每6小时注射30mg/kg。PT组患者在手术结束前1小时接受1.5mg/kg曲马多。对于PN组患者,由于纳布啡的μ受体拮抗作用,在停用瑞芬太尼后注射0.15mg/kg纳布啡。在完全清醒的患者拔管后(0小时)以及术后1、2、4、8和24小时,使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估术后疼痛。当VAS评分≥30mm时,给予额外的曲马多(1.5mg/kg)或0.15mg/kg纳布啡。采用曼萨法和卡普兰-迈耶法比较镇痛效果。同时也测量了药物的不良反应。三组患者接受的瑞芬太尼总剂量相似(0.27±0.1μg/kg/min)。所有患者在注射瑞芬太尼后6±3分钟内完成拔管。P组术后镇痛无效;因此,在第8例患者之后停止该组的纳入。其余两组术后镇痛有效,因为VAS评分相似,但在术后1小时,纳布啡的效果更好(P = 0.001)。然而,达到这样的结果需要的曲马多剂量明显多于纳布啡(P < 0.05)。PT组观察到更多的恶心和呕吐病例,但差异不显著(P < 0.06)。总之,幕上神经外科手术后的疼痛必须得到重视,单独使用对乙酰氨基酚不足以缓解患者的疼痛。在对乙酰氨基酚中添加曲马多或纳布啡似乎是实现充分镇痛所必需的,不过,需要更大剂量的曲马多才能达到这一目标。