GD Animal Health, Deventer, the Netherlands.
Avian Pathol. 2020 Feb;49(1):56-61. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2019.1664725. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
In this study, the relative contribution of vertical transmission, within-farm transmission and between-farm transmission of in layer pullet flocks was quantified using logistic regression analysis. Data from 311 Dutch pullet flocks, of which 172 (55%) were positive for , were included in the study. Also the status of the parent stock of these flocks was included. The status was determined with the rapid plate agglutination test. Data analysis showed that vertical transmission was the most important transmission route for in layers as is demonstrated by an odds ratio of 5.8 (= 0.000). A positive association with infections was found for layer pullet flocks on a multi-house farm where at least one other flock was -positive compared to single-house farms (odds ratio 3.1, 0.022), while a negative association was found when no other -positive flocks were present (odds ratio = 0.2, 0.003). No association was found between status of pullet flocks and poultry farm density. Odds ratios were 0.54 ( = 0.288) and 0.34 (= 0.073), respectively, for medium and highest poultry farm density compared to lowest poultry farm density. This is the first time that the relative contribution of horizontal and vertical transmission of has been quantified. These results can be extrapolated to control in general, and emphasize the importance of control in parent stock and practical channelling.
在这项研究中,使用逻辑回归分析定量了垂直传播、场内传播和场间传播在蛋鸡育雏鸡群中对 的相对贡献。该研究纳入了 311 个荷兰育雏鸡群的数据,其中 172 个(55%)对 呈阳性。还包括这些鸡群的母本种群的 状况。 状况是用 快速平板凝集试验确定的。数据分析表明,垂直传播是 感染蛋鸡的最重要传播途径,其优势比为 5.8(=0.000)。在多栋鸡舍农场中,与单栋鸡舍农场相比,至少有一个其他鸡群呈 阳性的蛋鸡育雏鸡群与 感染呈正相关(优势比 3.1,0.022),而当没有其他阳性鸡群时,与 感染呈负相关(优势比=0.2,0.003)。鸡群的 状况与家禽养殖场密度之间没有关联。中密度和高密度家禽养殖场的优势比分别为 0.54(=0.288)和 0.34(=0.073),与低密度家禽养殖场相比。这是首次定量评估 水平和垂直传播对 的相对贡献。这些结果可以推广到 控制的一般情况,强调了在母本种群和实际渠道中控制 的重要性。