Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jan;68(1):78-86. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16157. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Guideline-based management of cardiovascular disease often involves prescribing multiple medications, which contributes to polypharmacy and risk for adverse drug events in older adults. Deprescribing is a potential strategy to mitigate these risks. We sought to characterize and compare clinician perspectives regarding deprescribing cardiovascular medications across three specialties.
National cross-sectional survey.
Ambulatory.
Random sample of geriatricians, general internists, and cardiologists from the American College of Physicians.
Electronic survey assessing clinical practice of deprescribing cardiovascular medications, reasons and barriers to deprescribing, and choice of medications to deprescribe in hypothetical clinical cases.
In each specialty, 750 physicians were surveyed, with a response rate of 26% for geriatricians, 26% for general internists, and 12% for cardiologists. Over 80% of respondents within each specialty reported that they had recently considered deprescribing a cardiovascular medication. Adverse drug reactions were the most common reason for deprescribing for all specialties. Geriatricians also commonly reported deprescribing in the setting of limited life expectancy. Barriers to deprescribing were shared across specialties and included concerns about interfering with other physicians' treatment plans and patient reluctance. In hypothetical cases, over 90% of physicians in each specialty chose to deprescribe when patients experienced adverse drug reactions. Geriatricians were most likely and cardiologists were least likely to consider deprescribing cardiovascular medications in cases of limited life expectancy (all P < .001), such as recurrent metastatic cancer (84% of geriatricians, 68% of general internists, and 45% of cardiologists), Alzheimer dementia (92% of geriatricians, 81% of general internists, and 59% of cardiologists), or significant functional impairment (83% of geriatricians, 68% of general internists, and 45% of cardiologists).
While barriers to deprescribing cardiovascular medications are shared across specialties, reasons for deprescribing, especially in the setting of limited life expectancy, varied. Implementing deprescribing will require improved processes for both physician-physician and physician-patient communication. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:78-86, 2019.
背景/目的:基于指南的心血管疾病管理通常涉及开具多种药物,这会导致老年人药物过多和发生不良药物事件的风险增加。减少药物剂量是减轻这些风险的一种潜在策略。我们旨在描述和比较三个专业的临床医生在减少心血管药物剂量方面的观点。
全国横断面调查。
门诊。
从美国医师学院抽取的老年病学、普通内科和心脏病学的随机样本。
评估减少心血管药物剂量的临床实践、减少药物剂量的原因和障碍以及在假设临床病例中选择减少哪种药物剂量的电子调查。
每个专业都调查了 750 名医生,老年病学医生的回应率为 26%,普通内科医生的回应率为 26%,心脏病学医生的回应率为 12%。每个专业中超过 80%的受访者报告说他们最近考虑减少一种心血管药物的剂量。所有专业都将药物不良反应作为减少药物剂量的最常见原因。老年病学医生也经常报告在预期寿命有限的情况下减少药物剂量。减少药物剂量的障碍在各个专业中都存在,包括担心干扰其他医生的治疗计划和患者不愿意。在假设的情况下,每个专业的医生在患者出现药物不良反应时,超过 90%的人选择减少药物剂量。老年病学医生最有可能,心脏病学医生最不可能在预期寿命有限的情况下减少心血管药物剂量,如复发性转移性癌症(84%的老年病学医生、68%的普通内科医生和 45%的心脏病学医生)、阿尔茨海默病痴呆(92%的老年病学医生、81%的普通内科医生和 59%的心脏病学医生)或严重功能障碍(83%的老年病学医生、68%的普通内科医生和 45%的心脏病学医生)。
虽然减少心血管药物剂量的障碍在各个专业中都存在,但减少药物剂量的原因,特别是在预期寿命有限的情况下,存在差异。实施减少药物剂量需要改进医生之间以及医生与患者之间的沟通流程。美国老年学会杂志 68:78-86, 2019。