Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York.
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Nov 1;122(5):1937-1945. doi: 10.1152/jn.00486.2019. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
Response properties of MT neurons are often studied with "bikinetic" plaid stimuli, which consist of two superimposed sine wave gratings moving in different directions. Oculomotor studies using "unikinetic plaids" in which only one of the two superimposed gratings moves suggest that the eyes first move reflexively in the direction of the moving grating and only later converge on the perceived direction of the moving pattern. MT has been implicated as the source of visual signals that drives these responses. We wanted to know whether stationary gratings, which have little effect on MT cells when presented alone, would influence MT responses when paired with a moving grating. We recorded extracellularly from neurons in area MT and measured responses to stationary and moving gratings, and to their sums: bikinetic and unikinetic plaids. As expected, stationary gratings presented alone had a very modest influence on the activity of MT neurons. Responses to moving gratings and bikinetic plaids were similar to those previously reported and revealed cells selective for the motion of plaid patterns and of their components (pattern and component cells). When these neurons were probed with unikinetic plaids, pattern cells shifted their direction preferences in a way that revealed the influence of the static grating. Component cell preferences shifted little or not at all. These results support the notion that pattern-selective neurons in area MT integrate component motions that differ widely in speed, and that they do so in a way that is consistent with an intersection-of-constraints model. Human perceptual and eye movement responses to moving gratings are influenced by adding a second, static grating to create a "unikinetic" plaid. Cells in MT do not respond to static gratings, but those gratings still influence the direction selectivity of some MT cells. The cells influenced by static gratings are those tuned for the motion of global patterns, but not those tuned only for the individual components of moving targets.
MT 神经元的反应特性通常用“运动融合”光栅刺激来研究,这种刺激由两个以不同方向移动的叠加正弦光栅组成。使用“非运动融合”光栅的眼球运动研究表明,只有两个叠加光栅中的一个移动,眼睛首先反射性地向移动光栅的方向移动,然后才收敛到移动模式的感知方向。MT 被认为是驱动这些反应的视觉信号的来源。我们想知道,当与移动光栅配对时,单独呈现对 MT 细胞几乎没有影响的静止光栅是否会影响 MT 反应。我们从 MT 区的神经元中记录了细胞外电活动,并测量了对静止和移动光栅以及它们的总和(运动融合和非运动融合光栅)的反应。正如预期的那样,单独呈现的静止光栅对 MT 神经元的活动只有很小的影响。对移动光栅和运动融合光栅的反应与之前报道的相似,并揭示了对光栅图案及其成分(图案和成分细胞)运动有选择性的细胞。当这些神经元被非运动融合光栅探测时,图案细胞的方向偏好发生了变化,这揭示了静态光栅的影响。成分细胞的偏好几乎没有变化或根本没有变化。这些结果支持这样的观点,即在 MT 区中,对图案有选择性的神经元整合了在速度上差异很大的成分运动,并且它们的整合方式与约束交叉模型一致。人类对移动光栅的感知和眼球运动反应受到添加第二个静态光栅以创建“非运动融合”光栅的影响。MT 中的细胞对静态光栅没有反应,但这些光栅仍然会影响一些 MT 细胞的方向选择性。受静态光栅影响的细胞是那些对全局图案运动有调谐的细胞,而不是那些只对移动目标的单个成分有调谐的细胞。