Department Psychiatry Amsterdam University Medical Centre-location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department Psychiatry Amsterdam University Medical Centre-location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222046. eCollection 2019.
Co-payments, used to control rising costs of healthcare, may lead to disruption of appropriate outpatient care and to increases in acute crisis treatment or hospital admission in patients with schizophrenia. An abrupt rise in co-payments in 2012 in the Netherlands offered a natural experiment to study the effects of co-payments on continuity of healthcare in schizophrenia.
Retrospective longitudinal registry-based cohort study. Outcome measures were (i) continuity of elective (planned) psychiatric care (outpatient care and/or antipsychotic medication); (ii) acute psychiatric care (crisis treatment and hospital admission); and (iii) somatic care per quarter of the years 2009-2014.
10 911 patients with schizophrenia were included. During the six-year follow-up period the level of elective psychiatric outpatient care (-20%); and acute psychiatric care (-37%) decreased. Treatment restricted to antipsychotic medication (without concurrent outpatient psychiatric care) increased (67%). The use of somatic care also increased (24%). Use of acute psychiatric care was highest in quarters when only antipsychotic medication was received. The majority (59%) of patients received continuous elective psychiatric care in 2009-2014. Patients receiving continuous care needed only half the acute psychiatric care needed by patients not in continuous care. On top of these trends time series analysis (ARIMA) showed that the abrupt rise in co-payments from 2012 onwards coincided with significant increases in stand-alone treatment with antipsychotic medication and acute psychiatric care.
The use of psychiatric care decreased substantially among a cohort of patients with schizophrenia. The high rise in co-payments from 2012 onwards coincided with significant increases in stand-alone treatment with antipsychotic medication and acute psychiatric care.
为了控制医疗保健成本的上升,共同支付额被用于控制医疗成本。但共同支付额的使用可能会导致精神分裂症患者的门诊治疗中断,并导致急性危机治疗或住院治疗的增加。2012 年荷兰突然提高共同支付额,为研究共同支付额对精神分裂症患者医疗连续性的影响提供了一个自然实验。
回顾性纵向基于登记的队列研究。观察指标为:(i)选择性(计划)精神科治疗的连续性(门诊治疗和/或抗精神病药物);(ii)急性精神科治疗(危机治疗和住院治疗);(iii)2009-2014 年每季度的躯体护理。
共纳入 10911 例精神分裂症患者。在 6 年的随访期间,选择性精神病门诊治疗(下降 20%)和急性精神病治疗(下降 37%)减少。只接受抗精神病药物治疗(不伴同时的门诊精神科治疗)的治疗方式增加(增加 67%)。躯体护理的使用也增加(增加 24%)。仅接受抗精神病药物治疗的患者中,急性精神科治疗的使用率最高(占 59%)。在 2009-2014 年期间,大多数(59%)患者接受了连续的选择性精神病治疗。接受连续治疗的患者所需的急性精神病护理仅为未接受连续护理的患者的一半。除了这些趋势,时间序列分析(ARIMA)还显示,2012 年以来共同支付额的突然增加与单独使用抗精神病药物和急性精神病治疗的显著增加相一致。
在一组精神分裂症患者中,精神科治疗的使用率大幅下降。2012 年以来共同支付额的大幅增加与单独使用抗精神病药物和急性精神病治疗的显著增加相一致。