Institute of Thermodynamics and Thermal Process Engineering, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 9, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
J Chem Phys. 2019 Sep 14;151(10):104102. doi: 10.1063/1.5116912.
We develop a perturbation theory for the difference between the Helmholtz energy of a Stockmayer fluid, i.e., a fluid interacting by a Lennard-Jones plus point-dipole potential, and a Lennard-Jones fluid. We show that the difference can be approximated by the perturbational Helmholtz energy contribution of a dipolar hard-sphere fluid with a suitably chosen effective hard-sphere diameter, relative to a hard-sphere fluid with the same effective diameter. We analyze both a third and fourth order perturbation theory, both written as Padé approximations. Several recipes for calculating the hard-sphere diameter are investigated; we find that the Weeks-Chandler-Andersen diameter is most suitable. Results of the perturbation theory are shown to be in good agreement with reference data for the Helmholtz energy, internal energy, and isochoric heat capacity as obtained from molecular simulations performed in this work and to vapor-liquid equilibrium data from the literature. Theoretical predictions of the proposed model are compared to results from the perturbation theory of Gubbins and Twu [Chem. Eng. Sci. 33, 863 (1978)], which is a theory based on a Lennard-Jones reference fluid. We find the theories are in good agreement. Our approach can easily be applied to van der Waals potentials, other than Lennard-Jones potentials. If a dipolar Mie fluid is considered, the approach merely requires calculation of the effective hard-sphere diameter for a Mie potential. We further note that the approach has a reduction in the variable space of the underlying correlation integrals, i.e., the correlation functions of a hard-sphere fluid depend on density only, whereas the Lennard-Jones reference correlation functions depend on density and temperature.
我们发展了一种用于斯托克默尔流体(即通过 Lennard-Jones 加点偶极子势相互作用的流体)的亥姆霍兹能量与 Lennard-Jones 流体之间差异的微扰理论。我们表明,这种差异可以通过具有适当选择的有效硬球直径的偶极硬球流体的微扰亥姆霍兹能量贡献来近似,相对于具有相同有效直径的硬球流体。我们分析了三阶和四阶微扰理论,两者均写为 Padé 逼近。研究了几种计算硬球直径的方法;我们发现 Weeks-Chandler-Andersen 直径最适合。微扰理论的结果与从本文进行的分子模拟获得的亥姆霍兹能量、内能和等容热容的参考数据以及文献中的汽液平衡数据非常吻合。所提出模型的理论预测与 Gubbins 和 Twu [Chem. Eng. Sci. 33, 863 (1978)]的微扰理论的结果进行了比较,后者是基于 Lennard-Jones 参考流体的理论。我们发现这些理论非常吻合。我们的方法可以很容易地应用于范德华势,而不仅仅是 Lennard-Jones 势。如果考虑偶极 Mie 流体,则该方法仅需要计算 Mie 势的有效硬球直径。我们还注意到,该方法减少了基础相关积分的变量空间,即硬球流体的相关函数仅取决于密度,而 Lennard-Jones 参考相关函数取决于密度和温度。