Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Operative Care Division, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jan;35(1):12-16.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.030. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
In 2016, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began its first mandatory bundled payment program, the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model, which covers a 90-day episode of care. This study determined whether oncology patients enrolled in the CJR bundle incur higher hospital costs than patients with osteoarthritis (OA).
A retrospective review of all patients enrolled in the CJR bundled payments system from April 1, 2016 to June 31, 2018 at a single academic medical center was conducted. To determine whether tumor patients had higher total episode costs, this group was compared to patients diagnosed with OA using a 2-tailed t-test. To adjust for moderators of total hospital costs, we used generalized linear regression with a log-link, including multiple variables abstracted from chart review.
Three hundred fourteen patients met inclusion criteria (12 primary or metastatic tumors, 302 OA). Fifty-eight percent of tumor patients were over the target price vs 16% of OA patients. The mean tumor patient had $40,862 for total internal hospital costs compared to $16,356 in the OA group (P < .001). Length of stay was greater in the tumor group (6.75 vs 2.0 days, P < .001). A greater percentage of tumor patients were discharged to a skilled nursing facility (67% vs 27%, P = .006) with significantly higher skilled nursing facility episode costs ($18,852 vs $7731, P = .04). With adjustment for fracture status, tumor patients were 5.36 times more likely to exceed the CJR target price than OA patients (risk ratio 5.36, confidence interval 3.44-8.35, P < .001) and 50 times more likely to be outliers over the regional threshold than OA patients (risk ratio 50.33, confidence interval 16.33-155.19, P < .001).
Oncology patients enrolled in the CJR bundled payment model incur significantly higher costs and have higher cost variability than patients with OA. We recommend that oncology patients be excluded from the CJR bundle.
2016 年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)启动了首个强制性捆绑支付计划,即综合关节置换护理(Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement,CJR)模式,涵盖 90 天的护理期。本研究旨在确定参加 CJR 捆绑支付计划的肿瘤患者是否比骨关节炎(osteoarthritis,OA)患者的住院费用更高。
对单家学术医疗中心于 2016 年 4 月 1 日至 2018 年 6 月 31 日期间参加 CJR 捆绑支付系统的所有患者进行回顾性审查。为确定肿瘤患者的总发病成本是否更高,采用双侧 t 检验将该组与诊断为 OA 的患者进行比较。为调整总住院费用的调节因素,我们使用广义线性回归模型(log-link),包括从图表审查中提取的多个变量。
符合纳入标准的患者有 314 例(12 例原发性或转移性肿瘤,302 例 OA)。58%的肿瘤患者超过目标价格,而 OA 患者为 16%。肿瘤患者的总内部住院费用平均为 40862 美元,而 OA 组为 16356 美元(P<.001)。肿瘤组的住院时间更长(6.75 天比 2.0 天,P<.001)。更多的肿瘤患者出院至康复护理机构(67%比 27%,P=.006),康复护理机构的发病成本明显更高(18852 美元比 7731 美元,P=.04)。在调整骨折状态后,肿瘤患者比 OA 患者更有可能超过 CJR 目标价格(风险比 5.36,置信区间 3.44-8.35,P<.001),也更有可能成为区域阈值以上的异常值(风险比 50.33,置信区间 16.33-155.19,P<.001)。
参加 CJR 捆绑支付模式的肿瘤患者的费用显著更高,且费用变异性更高。我们建议将肿瘤患者排除在 CJR 捆绑支付之外。