Cardiovascular Center, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, 4-32, Umeda 2-chome, Kita-ku, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
J Cardiol. 2020 Apr;75(4):352-359. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.08.014. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
Left atrial (LA) size is an established predictor of recurrence after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). We investigated the impact of baseline LA function on recurrence after PAF ablation and compared the predictive values of LA function with those of LA size.
We retrospectively investigated 292 consecutive patients who underwent PAF ablation (median follow-up: 3.0 years). All patients had their preoperative LA volume (LAV) assessed using cardiac computed tomography under sinus rhythm. We used LA emptying fraction (LAEF) as an indicator of LA function and assessed the association between baseline LAEF and recurrence after initial ablation using a multivariate Cox hazard model. Then, we performed receiver operating characteristic analysis for predicting recurrence after single and multiple procedures and compared the c-statistics of LAEF and indexed maximum and minimum LAV (LAVI and LAVI) RESULTS: In a multivariate Cox hazard model, LAEF was strongly associated with recurrence after a single procedure [hazard ratio (HR): 0.968, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.951-0.985, p < 0.001]. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis for predicting recurrence, the predictive accuracy of LAEF was mild after a single procedure [area under the curve (AUC): 0.666, p < 0.001] and moderate after multiple procedures (AUC: 0.701, p < 0.001). The c-statistic of LAEF was significantly higher than those of LAVI and LAVI after a single procedure (p < 0.05, for both). After adjustment for factors related to reduced LAEF (increased serum brain natriuretic peptide, age, LA diameter, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction), it was still associated with recurrence (HR: 0.964, 95% CI: 0.946-0.982, p < 0.001).
LAEF was associated with recurrence after PAF ablation. LA function is a more useful predictor than LA size.
左心房(LA)大小是阵发性心房颤动(PAF)导管消融后复发的既定预测因子。我们研究了基线 LA 功能对 PAF 消融后复发的影响,并比较了 LA 功能与 LA 大小的预测价值。
我们回顾性调查了 292 例连续接受 PAF 消融的患者(中位随访:3.0 年)。所有患者均在窦性心律下使用心脏计算机断层扫描评估术前 LA 容积(LAV)。我们使用 LA 排空分数(LAEF)作为 LA 功能的指标,并使用多变量 Cox 风险模型评估初始消融后基线 LAEF 与复发之间的关系。然后,我们对单次和多次手术后的复发进行了接收者操作特征分析,并比较了 LAEF 和索引最大和最小 LAV(LAVI 和 LAVI)的 c 统计量。
在多变量 Cox 风险模型中,LAEF 与单次手术后的复发密切相关[风险比(HR):0.968,95%置信区间(CI):0.951-0.985,p<0.001]。在预测复发的接收者操作特征分析中,LAEF 在单次手术后的预测准确性为轻度(曲线下面积(AUC):0.666,p<0.001),在多次手术后为中度(AUC:0.701,p<0.001)。LAEF 的 c 统计量明显高于单次手术后的 LAVI 和 LAVI(均为 p<0.05)。在调整与 LAEF 降低相关的因素(血清脑钠肽升高、年龄、LA 直径和左心室射血分数降低)后,它仍然与复发相关(HR:0.964,95%CI:0.946-0.982,p<0.001)。
LAEF 与 PAF 消融后的复发相关。LA 功能是比 LA 大小更有用的预测因子。