• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CABG 改善缺血性心肌病患者的预后:随机对照 STICH 试验 10 年随访结果

CABG Improves Outcomes in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: 10-Year Follow-Up of the STICH Trial.

机构信息

Libin Cardiovascular Institute and University of Calgary Medical Centre, Calgary, Canada.

Duke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Oct;7(10):878-887. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.018
PMID:31521682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7375257/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The authors investigated the impact of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on first and recurrent hospitalization in this population.

BACKGROUND

In the STICH (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure) trial, CABG reduced all-cause death and hospitalization in patients with and ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular ejection fraction <35%.

METHODS

A total of 1,212 patients were randomized (610 to CABG + optimal medical therapy [CABG] and 602 to optimal medical therapy alone [MED] alone) and followed for a median of 9.8 years. All-cause and cause-specific hospitalizations were analyzed as time-to-first-event and as recurrent event analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 1,212 patients, 757 died (62.4%) and 732 (60.4%) were hospitalized at least once, for a total of 2,549 total all-cause hospitalizations. Most hospitalizations (66.2%) were for cardiovascular causes, of which approximately one-half (907 or 52.9%) were for heart failure. More than 70% of all hospitalizations (1,817 or 71.3%) were recurrent events. The CABG group experienced fewer all-cause hospitalizations in the time-to-first-event (349 CABG vs. 383 MED, adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74 to 0.98; p = 0.03) and in recurrent event analyses (1,199 CABG vs. 1,350 MED, HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.94; p < 0.001). This was driven by fewer total cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations (744 vs. 968; p < 0.001, adjusted HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.81; p = 0.001), the majority of which were due to HF (395 vs. 512; p < 0.001, adjusted HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.52-0.89; p = 0.005). We did not observe a difference in non-CV events.

CONCLUSIONS

CABG reduces all-cause, CV, and HF hospitalizations in time-to-first-event and recurrent event analyses. (Comparison of Surgical and Medical Treatment for Congestive Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease [STICH]; NCT00023595).

摘要

目的

作者研究了在这一人群中,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)对首次和再次住院的影响。

背景

在 STICH(缺血性心力衰竭的外科治疗)试验中,CABG 降低了缺血性心肌病和左心室射血分数<35%的患者的全因死亡和住院率。

方法

共有 1212 名患者被随机分配(610 名接受 CABG+最佳药物治疗[CABG],602 名仅接受最佳药物治疗[MED]),并随访中位数为 9.8 年。全因和病因特异性住院情况作为首次事件时间和复发性事件分析进行分析。

结果

在 1212 名患者中,757 人死亡(62.4%),732 人(60.4%)至少住院一次,共有 2549 例全因住院。大多数住院(66.2%)是心血管原因,其中约一半(907 例,52.9%)是心力衰竭。超过 70%的住院(1817 例,71.3%)是复发性事件。CABG 组首次事件时间(349 例 CABG 与 383 例 MED,调整后的危险比[HR]:0.85;95%置信区间[CI]:0.74 至 0.98;p=0.03)和复发性事件分析(1199 例 CABG 与 1350 例 MED,HR:0.78,95%CI:0.65 至 0.94;p<0.001)中全因住院次数较少。这归因于心血管(CV)总住院次数减少(744 例与 968 例;p<0.001,调整后的 HR:0.66,95%CI:0.55 至 0.81;p=0.001),其中大多数是心力衰竭(395 例与 512 例;p<0.001,调整后的 HR:0.68,95%CI:0.52-0.89;p=0.005)。我们没有观察到非 CV 事件的差异。

结论

CABG 降低首次事件时间和复发性事件分析中的全因、CV 和 HF 住院率。(充血性心力衰竭和冠状动脉疾病的外科治疗与药物治疗比较[STICH];NCT00023595)。

相似文献

1
CABG Improves Outcomes in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: 10-Year Follow-Up of the STICH Trial.CABG 改善缺血性心肌病患者的预后:随机对照 STICH 试验 10 年随访结果
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Oct;7(10):878-887. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
2
Ten-Year Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting According to Age in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: An Analysis of the Extended Follow-Up of the STICH Trial (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure).心力衰竭和左心室收缩功能障碍患者冠状动脉旁路移植术后十年结局按年龄分组:STICH试验(缺血性心力衰竭的外科治疗)长期随访分析
Circulation. 2016 Nov 1;134(18):1314-1324. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024800. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
3
Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.缺血性心肌病患者的冠状动脉搭桥手术
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 21;374(16):1511-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602001. Epub 2016 Apr 3.
4
Sex Difference in Patients With Ischemic Heart Failure Undergoing Surgical Revascularization: Results From the STICH Trial (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure).《STICH 试验(缺血性心力衰竭的外科治疗)中接受手术血运重建的缺血性心力衰竭患者的性别差异》。
Circulation. 2018 Feb 20;137(8):771-780. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030526.
5
Burden of medical co-morbidities and benefit from surgical revascularization in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.缺血性心肌病患者的医疗合并症负担和手术血运重建的获益。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Mar;21(3):373-381. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1404. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Medicine in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: The STICH Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与药物治疗缺血性心肌病的成本效果比较:随机临床试验 STICH。
Circulation. 2022 Mar 15;145(11):819-828. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056276. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
7
Exercise capacity and mortality in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction randomized to coronary artery bypass graft surgery or medical therapy: an analysis from the STICH trial (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure).运动能力与缺血性左心室功能障碍患者的死亡率:来自 STICH 试验(缺血性心力衰竭的外科治疗)的冠状动脉旁路移植术或药物治疗随机分组的分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Aug;2(4):335-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
8
Does prior coronary angioplasty affect outcomes of surgical coronary revascularization? Insights from the STICH trial.既往冠状动脉成形术是否影响冠状动脉旁路移植术的结局?来自 STICH 试验的结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Sep 15;291:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.03.029. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
9
The STICH trial (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure): mode-of-death results.STICH 试验(缺血性心力衰竭的手术治疗):死亡模式结果。
JACC Heart Fail. 2013 Oct;1(5):400-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
10
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without diabetes in the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial.缺血性心力衰竭外科治疗(STICH)试验中糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的临床特征及预后
Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Jul;17(7):725-34. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.288. Epub 2015 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on Microaxial Flow Pump Support in Patients With Severely Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.左心室射血分数严重降低患者在微轴流泵支持下的冠状动脉旁路移植术
Artif Organs. 2025 Aug;49(8):1346-1355. doi: 10.1111/aor.15038. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
2
Mitral repair with annuloplasty for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in people undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.在接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者中,采用瓣环成形术进行二尖瓣修复治疗中度缺血性二尖瓣反流。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 21;3(3):CD015777. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015777.
3
Incidental Coronary Artery Calcification and the Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes.偶然发现的冠状动脉钙化与主要不良心血管事件风险
Cureus. 2024 Nov 12;16(11):e73531. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73531. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guideline of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology and the Brazilian College of Radiology - 2024.巴西心脏病学会和巴西放射学会心血管计算机断层扫描与磁共振成像指南 - 2024年
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Oct 28;121(9):e20240608. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240608.
5
Propensity score-based comparison of high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting vs. left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with coronary artery disease and advanced heart failure.基于倾向评分的高危冠状动脉搭桥术与冠心病合并晚期心力衰竭患者左心室辅助装置植入术的比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 1;11:1430560. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1430560. eCollection 2024.
6
Outcomes of Percutaneous Revascularization in Severe Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction.严重缺血性左心室功能障碍患者经皮血运重建的结果。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 May;26(5):435-442. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02045-2. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
7
Official Scientific Statement from the Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery - The 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization and the 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for Chronic Coronary Disease.巴西心血管外科学会官方科学声明——2021年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会冠状动脉血运重建指南以及2023年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国胸科医师学会/美国预防心脏病学会/美国国家脂质协会/美国初级保健医师学会慢性冠状动脉疾病指南。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Apr 17;39(2):e20240990. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0990.
8
Coronary Artery Surgery: Past, Present, and Future.冠状动脉手术:过去、现在与未来。
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2024 Jan 19;15(1):e0001. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10515.
9
Ischemic cardiomyopathy: epidemiology, pathophysiology, outcomes, and therapeutic options.缺血性心肌病:流行病学、病理生理学、结局和治疗选择。
Heart Fail Rev. 2024 Jan;29(1):287-299. doi: 10.1007/s10741-023-10377-4. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
10
Impact of complete revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting for ischemic cardiomyopathy.完全血运重建在缺血性心肌病冠状动脉旁路移植术中的影响。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Apr 20;15:211-219. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.04.008. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure.经导管二尖瓣修复术治疗心力衰竭患者。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2307-2318. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806640. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
2
Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on recurrent events in the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARADIGM-HF).沙库巴曲缬沙坦对心力衰竭前瞻性比较评估血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对全球死亡率和发病率影响试验(PARADIGM-HF)中再发事件的影响。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Apr;20(4):760-768. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1139. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
3
Re-Examination of the BEST Trial Using Composite Outcomes, Including Emergency Department Visits.使用复合结局(包括急诊就诊)重新检查 BEST 试验。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Aug;5(8):591-599. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.04.005.
4
Effects of Canagliflozin on Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.卡格列净对 2 型糖尿病老年患者心血管生物标志物的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):704-712. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
5
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2017年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
6
The current and future financial burden of hospital admissions for heart failure in Canada: a cost analysis.加拿大心力衰竭住院治疗当前及未来的经济负担:一项成本分析。
CMAJ Open. 2016 Jul 21;4(3):E365-E370. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20150130. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.
7
Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.缺血性心肌病患者的冠状动脉搭桥手术
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 21;374(16):1511-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602001. Epub 2016 Apr 3.
8
Influence of Baseline Characteristics, Operative Conduct, and Postoperative Course on 30-Day Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Among Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Results From the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) Trial.基线特征、手术操作及术后病程对左心室功能不全患者冠状动脉旁路移植术30天预后的影响:缺血性心力衰竭外科治疗(STICH)试验结果
Circulation. 2015 Aug 25;132(8):720-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014932.
9
Neprilysin inhibition for heart failure.用于心力衰竭的中性肽链内切酶抑制作用
N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 11;371(24):2336-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1412654.
10
Effect of rosuvastatin on repeat heart failure hospitalizations: the CORONA Trial (Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in Heart Failure).**译文**: 氯吡格雷在减少缺血性事件方面优于安慰剂:CURE 试验(氯吡格雷在急性冠脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性研究)。
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Jun;2(3):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Apr 30.