Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY (I.L.P., Q.Z., N.C.)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY (I.L.P., Q.Z., N.C.).
Circulation. 2018 Feb 20;137(8):771-780. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030526.
Female sex is conventionally considered a risk factor for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and has been included as a poor prognostic factor in multiple cardiac operative risk evaluation scores. We aimed to investigate the association of sex and the long-term benefit of CABG in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction enrolled in the prospective STICH trial (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure Study).
The STICH trial randomized 1212 patients (148 [12%] women and 1064 [88%] men) with coronary artery disease and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% to CABG+medical therapy (MED) versus MED alone. Long-term (10-year) outcomes with each treatment were compared according to sex.
At baseline, women were older (63.4 versus 59.3 years; =0.016) with higher body mass index (27.9 versus 26.7 kg/m; =0.001). Women had more coronary artery disease risk factors (diabetes mellitus, 55.4% versus 37.2%; hypertension, 70.9% versus 58.6%; hyperlipidemia, 70.3% versus 58.9%) except for smoking (13.5% versus 21.8%) and had lower rates of prior CABG (0% versus 3.4%; all <0.05) than men. Moreover, women had higher New York Heart Association class (class III/IV, 66.2% versus 57.0%), lower 6-minute walk capacity (300 versus 350 m), and lower Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary scores (51 versus 63; all <0.05). Over 10 years of follow-up, all-cause mortality (49.0% versus 65.8%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.86; =0.002) and cardiovascular mortality (34.3% versus 52.3%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.89; =0.006) were significantly lower in women compared with men. With randomization to CABG+MED versus MED treatment, there was no significant interaction between sex and treatment group in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or the composite of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization (all >0.05). In addition, surgical deaths were not statistically different (1.5% versus 5.1%; =0.187) between sexes among patients randomized to CABG per protocol as initial treatment.
Sex is not associated with the effect of CABG+MED versus MED on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, the composite of death or cardiovascular hospitalization, or surgical deaths in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Thus, sex should not influence treatment decisions about CABG in these patients.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00023595.
传统上认为女性是冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的风险因素,并已被纳入多个心脏手术风险评估评分的预后不良因素。我们旨在研究前瞻性 STICH 试验(缺血性心力衰竭手术治疗研究)中纳入的左心室功能障碍的缺血性患者的性别与 CABG 的长期获益之间的关联。
STICH 试验随机分配了 1212 名患者(148[12%]名女性和 1064[88%]名男性),患有冠状动脉疾病和左心室射血分数≤35%,分别接受 CABG+药物治疗(MED)与 MED 单独治疗。根据性别比较每种治疗方法的长期(10 年)结果。
基线时,女性年龄较大(63.4 岁比 59.3 岁;=0.016),体重指数(27.9 千克/平方米比 26.7 千克/平方米;=0.001)较高。女性有更多的冠状动脉疾病危险因素(糖尿病,55.4%比 37.2%;高血压,70.9%比 58.6%;高脂血症,70.3%比 58.9%),但吸烟率较低(13.5%比 21.8%),先前 CABG 率也较低(0%比 3.4%;均<0.05)。此外,女性纽约心脏病协会心功能分级(III/IV 级,66.2%比 57.0%)较高,6 分钟步行距离(300 米比 350 米)较短,堪萨斯城心肌病问卷总体评分(51 分比 63 分;均<0.05)较低。在 10 年随访期间,全因死亡率(49.0%比 65.8%;调整后的危险比,0.67;95%置信区间,0.52-0.86;=0.002)和心血管死亡率(34.3%比 52.3%;调整后的危险比,0.65;95%置信区间,0.48-0.89;=0.006)女性显著低于男性。与 CABG+MED 与 MED 治疗随机分组相比,在全因死亡率、心血管死亡率或全因死亡率或心血管住院的复合终点方面,性别与治疗组之间没有显著的相互作用(均>0.05)。此外,在按方案将 CABG 作为初始治疗随机分组的患者中,手术死亡率在性别间无统计学差异(1.5%比 5.1%;=0.187)。
在左心室功能障碍的缺血性患者中,性别与 CABG+MED 与 MED 对全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、死亡或心血管住院的复合终点或手术死亡率的影响无关。因此,在这些患者中,性别不应该影响 CABG 的治疗决策。