Suppr超能文献

将健康影响纳入差异化污染税率体系:以中国京津冀地区为例。

Incorporating health impacts into a differentiated pollution tax rate system: A case study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in China.

机构信息

State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, CT, 06511, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2019 Nov 15;250:109527. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109527. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

Abstract

This paper argues for an efficient pollution tax rate system that reflects the differentiation of marginal health damages of the individual emission sources. Although China is the first country in the world to launch a regionally differentiated pollution tax rate program, due to the absence of marginal damage estimation, whether this policy is efficient and equitable remains unknown. In this paper, we build an Integrated Assessment Model to measure the marginal damage of SO2, NOx and PM2.5 emitted from 38 coal-fired power plants in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, and evaluate the policy performance of tax rate systems with different differentiation magnitudes. Results show that the spatial variations are huge, the range of marginal health damages of coal-fired power plants in the BTH region between the lowest and highest emission source is $2375 to $33245 per ton for SO2, $307 to $4984 per ton for NOx, and $11513 - $163126 per ton for PM2.5. Shifting from the uniform tax rate system to the current partially differentiated tax rate system will increase the total health benefits by 51.6% but with some regions worse-off than the uniform tax rate system. If we incorporate the source-specific variations of marginal health damages into the tax rate system, such a fully differentiated tax rate system will further increase the total health benefits of current partially differentiated tax rate system by 43.1% with every region better-off. Furthermore, even though the policy benefits of both differentiated tax rate systems are much more unequally distributed than uniform tax rates, their impacts on environmental inequalities are better than the uniform tax rate system. Because uniform tax rate systems do not offset the original inequalities of environmental health burdens while differentiated tax rate systems achieve this buy efficiently allocate mitigation targets among regions with different burdens.

摘要

本文主张建立一个反映个体污染源边际健康损害差异的有效污染税率体系。尽管中国是世界上第一个实施区域差异化污染税率方案的国家,但由于缺乏边际损害估计,该政策是否有效和公平仍不得而知。本文构建了一个综合评估模型,用以衡量京津冀地区 38 家燃煤电厂排放的 SO2、NOx 和 PM2.5 的边际损害,并评估了具有不同差异化程度的税率体系的政策绩效。结果表明,空间差异巨大,京津冀地区燃煤电厂的边际健康损害在 SO2 方面的范围从最低排放源到最高排放源为 2375 美元至 33245 美元/吨,NOx 为 307 美元至 4984 美元/吨,PM2.5 为 11513 美元至 163126 美元/吨。从统一税率体系转变为当前部分差异化税率体系将使总健康效益增加 51.6%,但有些地区的状况比统一税率体系更差。如果将边际健康损害的来源特定变化纳入税率体系,这种完全差异化的税率体系将使当前部分差异化税率体系的总健康效益进一步增加 43.1%,且每个地区的状况都更好。此外,尽管差异化税率体系的政策效益分配比统一税率更为不均等,但它们对环境不平等的影响要好于统一税率体系。因为统一税率体系不能抵消环境健康负担的原始不平等,而差异化税率体系则通过在不同负担地区之间有效分配减排目标来实现这一目标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验