Maenosono Ryoichi, Unagami Kohei, Kakuta Yoichi, Furusawa Miyuki, Okumi Masayoshi, Azuma Haruhito, Ishida Hideki, Tanabe Kazunari
Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
Int J Urol. 2019 Dec;26(12):1114-1120. doi: 10.1111/iju.14108. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
To examine the association of response to rituximab and the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection in preconditioning of rituximab and plasma exchange without post-transplant plasmapheresis in patients undergoing ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation.
A total of 115 patients who underwent ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation at Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, were divided into two groups based on the response to rituximab: good response (n = 75) or poor response (n = 40). The rituximab good response and poor response patients were defined as patients whose CD19 cells were non-detected (0%) and detected on the day of transplantation (2-5 days, median 3 days, after rituximab administration), respectively.
Rituximab response and anti-A/B blood antibody titer after plasmapheresis were significant risk factors for antibody-mediated rejection (P = 0.036, 0.045, respectively). The occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection was higher in the poor response group than in the good response group (22.5% vs 8.0%; P = 0.028). The 14-day, 3-month and 1-year cumulative incidence of antibody-mediated rejection was 2.7%, 5.3% and 8.0% in the good response group, and 17.5%, 20.0% and 22.5% in the poor response group after ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation. The patient survival was not significantly different between the two groups. However, graft survival 1 month after transplantation was lower in the poor response group. There is no significant difference in graft function and in the incidence of complications, including infection, after transplantation between the two groups.
Antibody-mediated rejection after ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation was significantly associated with the response to rituximab in our preconditioning protocol.
在接受ABO血型不相容的活体肾移植且移植后不行血浆置换的患者中,研究利妥昔单抗反应与抗体介导性排斥反应发生率之间的关联,该研究采用利妥昔单抗预处理联合血浆置换。
日本东京女子医科大学医院共115例接受ABO血型不相容的活体肾移植患者,根据对利妥昔单抗的反应分为两组:反应良好组(n = 75)和反应不佳组(n = 40)。利妥昔单抗反应良好和反应不佳的患者分别定义为移植当天(利妥昔单抗给药后2 - 5天,中位时间3天)CD19细胞未检测到(0%)和检测到的患者。
血浆置换后利妥昔单抗反应及抗A/B血型抗体滴度是抗体介导性排斥反应的显著危险因素(P分别为0.036、0.045)。反应不佳组抗体介导性排斥反应的发生率高于反应良好组(22.5%对8.0%;P = 0.028)。ABO血型不相容的活体肾移植后,反应良好组抗体介导性排斥反应的14天、3个月和1年累积发生率分别为2.7%、5.3%和8.0%,反应不佳组分别为17.5%、20.0%和22.5%。两组患者生存率无显著差异。然而,反应不佳组移植后1个月的移植物存活率较低。两组移植后移植物功能及包括感染在内的并发症发生率无显著差异。
在我们的预处理方案中,ABO血型不相容的活体肾移植后抗体介导性排斥反应与对利妥昔单抗的反应显著相关。