Escuela de Psicología, Departamento de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Del Bío Bío, Chillán, Chile.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental (CIIPME), Buenos Aires, Argentina. Universidad Adventista del Plata, Facultad de Humanidades, Educación y Ciencias Sociales, Entre Ríos, Argentina.
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2021 Jul-Sep;10(3):219-233. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2019.1660984. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
We conducted two empirical studies to (1) explore the dimensionality of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-2 (BRIEF-2) parent and teacher forms, (2) examine the association between the parent and teacher reports, and (3) analyze the relationship between the BRIEF-2 ratings and performance-based measures of executive functions (EFs) (including working memory, inhibition, and shifting tasks) and academic achievement in children. In Study 1 ( = 212 parents; = 111 teachers), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that a three-factor solution that included the indices of (1) behavior regulation, (2) emotion regulation, and (3) cognitive regulation best fit the data. In Study 2 ( = 275 8- to 12-year-old Spanish-speaking children), selective and low correlations were found between performance- and rater-based measures of EFs. In addition, low to moderate correlations were found between parent and teacher reports. However, the three indices of both forms of the BRIEF-2 were associated with the diverse academic domains analyzed, although differences emerged depending on the informant (teacher vs. parent). Our results support the hypothesis that the two EF measures document different underlying processes. The clinical and educational implications of considering both perspectives in the assessment of EFs in children with typical development and in children with neurodevelopmental disorders are discussed.
我们进行了两项实证研究,以(1)探索行为评定量表-执行功能 2 家长版和教师版(BRIEF-2)的维度,(2)检验家长报告和教师报告之间的关联,以及(3)分析 BRIEF-2 评分与基于表现的执行功能(EFs)测量(包括工作记忆、抑制和转换任务)以及儿童学业成绩之间的关系。在研究 1(=212 名家长;=111 名教师)中,验证性因子分析(CFA)表明,包括以下指标的三因素解决方案最适合数据:(1)行为调节,(2)情绪调节,和(3)认知调节。在研究 2(=275 名 8 至 12 岁的讲西班牙语的儿童)中,发现基于表现和评定者的 EFs 测量之间存在选择性和低相关性。此外,家长和教师报告之间存在低到中度相关性。然而,BRIEF-2 的两种形式的三个指标都与分析的不同学术领域相关,尽管因信息提供者(教师与家长)而异。我们的结果支持以下假设:这两种 EF 测量记录了不同的潜在过程。讨论了在评估具有典型发育和神经发育障碍的儿童的 EFs 时,同时考虑这两个视角的临床和教育意义。