多维度城市绿地质量评估工具的系统评价。
A systematic review of multi-dimensional quality assessment tools for urban green spaces.
机构信息
Environment and Human Health Lab (EH(2) Lab), Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA-UAB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.
ISGlobal, Campus Mar, Parc de Recerca Biomèdica de Barcelona (PRBB), Doctor Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain; Pompeu Fabra University, Doctor Aiguader 80, 08003, Barcelona, Spain; Ciber on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Melchor Fernández Almagro, 3-5, 28029, Madrid, Spain.
出版信息
Health Place. 2019 Sep;59:102198. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102198. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
We conducted a systematic review of quality assessment tools for urban green spaces to evaluate their replicability, comparability and validity. We assessed the characteristics of 15 published, multi-dimensional, direct observation tools regarding: publication, development, features and included dimensions. Even though all tools show acceptable inter-rater variability, there is a notable variability in their characteristics, from required time to conduct the assessment to the number of included items. Additionally, some specific dimensions are underrepresented, and the study units' definitions are feeble. We showcased the need for new tools that are more comprehensive and include more consistent reporting measures.
我们对城市绿地的质量评估工具进行了系统评价，以评估它们的可重复性、可比性和有效性。我们评估了 15 种已发表的、多维的、直接观察工具的特征，包括出版物、开发、特征和包含的维度。尽管所有工具的评分者间变异性都可接受，但它们的特征存在显著差异，从评估所需的时间到包含的项目数量不等。此外，一些特定的维度被低估，研究单位的定义也很薄弱。我们展示了对更全面、包含更一致报告措施的新工具的需求。
Zotero 插件