Mukherjee Suzanne, Tennant Alan, Beresford Bryony
University of York, York, UK.
Luzern University, Luceren, Switzerland.
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2020 Jan/Feb;37(1):55-64. doi: 10.1177/1043454219873638. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
Burnout in health service staff is a cause for concern since it has negative consequences for the individual affected, the wider organization, and patients. The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) has been widely used to assess the prevalence of burnout within oncology services. The MBI-HSS is a self-report measure comprising three subscales-Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP), and Personal Accomplishment (PA). This article reports on the first study to investigate the psychometric properties of the MBI-HSS when administered to pediatric oncology staff. Two hundred and three pediatric oncology staff recruited through seven UK Principal Treatment Centers (PTCs) and a children's cancer charity completed the MBI-HSS. The factor structure of the instrument was tested using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis, with Rasch analysis applied to assess whether the measure meets the requirements of an interval-level scale. Cronbach alpha was used to assess internal reliability. Factor analysis did not support the traditional three-factor structure of the MBI-HSS but instead suggested seven factors. Rasch analysis and alpha coefficients indicated that while the EE and the PA subscales fulfilled the requirements of an interval-level measure for group-level diagnosis, DP did not. Further investigation revealed a "floor effect" on many DP items. Whereas the EE and PA subscales of the MBI-HSS can be used in research with pediatric oncology staff working in PTCs, there are considerable problems with the DP subscale, and researchers should be cautious in interpreting data from this subscale.
医疗卫生服务人员的职业倦怠令人担忧,因为它会对受影响的个人、更广泛的组织以及患者产生负面影响。马氏职业倦怠量表-人类服务调查(MBI-HSS)已被广泛用于评估肿瘤服务领域职业倦怠的患病率。MBI-HSS是一种自我报告量表,由三个分量表组成——情感耗竭(EE)、去个性化(DP)和个人成就感(PA)。本文报告了第一项针对MBI-HSS应用于儿科肿瘤医护人员时的心理测量特性进行调查的研究。通过英国的七个主要治疗中心(PTC)和一家儿童癌症慈善机构招募了203名儿科肿瘤医护人员,他们完成了MBI-HSS量表的填写。使用验证性和探索性因素分析对该量表的因素结构进行了测试,并应用拉施分析来评估该量表是否符合区间水平量表的要求。使用克朗巴哈系数来评估内部信度。因素分析并不支持MBI-HSS传统的三因素结构,而是显示出七个因素。拉施分析和系数表明,虽然EE和PA分量表满足了群体水平诊断的区间水平测量要求,但DP分量表并不满足。进一步调查发现许多DP项目存在“地板效应”。虽然MBI-HSS的EE和PA分量表可用于对在PTC工作的儿科肿瘤医护人员的研究,但DP分量表存在相当大的问题,研究人员在解释该分量表的数据时应谨慎。